The null ritual : What you always wanted to know about significance testing but were afraid to ask

By Gerd Gigerenzer, S. Krauss, O. Vitouch. 2004

187 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b308ab0e4a8b7fea898d5a11fb41496c6c2be057

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Decision Sciences

Citations in the corpus

Strengthening statistical usage in marine ecology (2012, background): “…are particularly notable: Carver, 1978; Cohen, 1994; Fidler et al., 2006; Gelman and Stern, 2006; Germano, 1999; Gerrodette, 2011; Gigerenzer, 2004; Gigerenzer et al., 2004; Hubbard and Bayarri, 2003; Johnson, 1999; Martίnez-Abraίn, 2007; Sellke et al., 2001; Silva-Ayçaguer et al., 2010; Stang et…”
Why We Don't Really Know What Statistical Significance Means: Implications for Educators (2006, background): “FOOTNOTES 1 For a fuller account of these distinctions see Gigerenzer, Krauss, and Vitouch (2004), Goodman (1993), Royall (1997), and especially Hubbard and Bayarri (2003).”
Design Science Methodology for Information Systems and Software Engineering (2014, methodology): “” This is close to the software engineering concept of an architecture [25], with the special twist that Illari and Williamson treat entities and activities on the same footing.”
Why P Values Are Not a Useful Measure of Evidence in Statistical Significance Testing (2008, background): “Edwards, Lindman, and Savage (1963), Gigerenzer and his colleagues (Gigerenzer, 1993; Gigerenzer et al., 2004; Gigerenzer & Murray, 1987; Gigerenzer et al., 1989), and Nickerson (2000) being notable exceptions— remain unaware of many of the reasons why this index is a defective measure of evidence.”
Final Collapse of the Neyman-Pearson Decision Theoretic Framework and Rise of the neoFisherian (2009, methodology): “…framework in its current form is “a mixture of [the methods of] R. A. Fisher, on the one hand, and Jerzy Neyman and Egon S. Pearson on the other, a mixture that none of these statisticians (certainly not Neyman and Pearson) would have approved” (Gigerenzer & Murray 1987, Gigerenzer et al. 2004).”
Deception in Experiments: Revisiting the Arguments in Its Defense (2008, unknown): “Does the empirical evidence indeed suggest that participants do not harbor such feelings? To avoid opportunistic sampling of evidence (see Christensen’s, 1988, oversight), we referenced here all published journal articles that Kimmel (1998, pp. 104–107) in his recent review cited in support of his c”