On the social desirability of urban rail transit systems

By Clifford Winston, Vikram Maheshri. 2007

159 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management, Transportation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b2de90c3edf6985f5ba1574df96a644780da3a49

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. C.-Y. Cynthia Lin Lawell
2. Justin Beaudoin
3. Y. H. Farzin

In Transportation

1. C.-Y. Cynthia Lin Lawell
2. Justin Beaudoin
3. Y. H. Farzin
4. G. Searle
5. P. Rickwood
6. G. Glazebrook

Citations in the corpus

• Bicycle Infrastructure and Traffic Congestion: Evidence from DC's Capital Bikeshare (2018, unknown): “congestion and thus fails to reap the corresponding environmental benefits (Rubin et al., 1999; Winston and Langer, 2006; Winston and Maheshri, 2007; Duranton and Turner, 2011).”
• Public transit investment and sustainable transportation: A review of studies of transit's impact on traffic congestion and air quality (2015, background): “As with Winston and Maheshri (2007) and Nelson et al. (2007), this provides convincing evidence of the effects of transit on congestion at the extensive margin (comparing the outcome of an existing transit network with the counterfactual outcome without any transit service), but it does not…”
• Urban Structure and Energy—A Review (2008, background): “(Winston & Maheshri, 2007, p. 16; italics ours) Furthermore, we find economists to have a consistent predilection for analysis of marginal effects with linear models, and ignore land use and other non-linear feedbacks—a point made by Newman and Kenworthy (1992) in their initial response to…”