Patent applications and subsequent changes of performance: evidence from time-series cross-section analyses on the firm level

By Holger Ernst. 2001

522 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b2265f11f81ef4e0cba4997f11680aac9d9bf88b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management of Technology and Innovation

Citations in the corpus

An approach to discovering new technology opportunities: Keyword-based patent map approach (2009, background): “Ernst (1995, 2001) has found that firms that have an active patent strategy are more successful than others that remain inactive in the mechanical engineering sector.”
The Geography of Complex Knowledge (2017, background): “…and Griliches (1990) provide early reviews of the use and abuse of patent data, it is now relatively well established that patents, as measures of innovation, are positively linked to firm valuations and future performance (Ernst 2001; Bloom and Van Reenen 2002; Balasubramanian and Sivadasan 2011).”
Managerial foresight and attempted rent appropriation: insider trading on knowledge of imminent breakthroughs (2005, unknown): “Even then, it may take more time before the product’s performance can be fully assessed in the marketplace (Ernst, 2001).”
Measuring innovative performance: is there an advantage in using multiple indicators? (2003, background): “…innovation and the related be clearly deﬁned in comprehension of some technical our understanding We deﬁne inventive models of new systems (Ernst, 2001; discussed further characteristics of these indicators, might generate greater insight. concepts that are relevant in the context of…”
Patents, Trademarks, and Their Complementarity in Venture Capital Funding (2016, unknown): “Patents show that a firm possesses an invention or technology that is worth being protected (Ernst, 2001).”
Corporate Technology Portfolios and R&D Performance Measures: A Study of Technology Intensive Firms (2005, unknown): “Ernst (2001) also supported the use of patent data as an output indicator of corporate R&D activities for business administration as well as empirical research.”
Appropriate intellectual property protection and economic growth in countries at different levels of development (2012, background): “2 See http://www.wipo.int/sme/en/ip business/utility models/utility models.htm nd http://www.wipo.int/sme/en/ip business/acquire protection.htm. cy 41 (2012) 358– 375 359 to innovation and growth, not on the nature of the instrument used to protect innovation.”
CSR, Innovation, and Firm Performance in Sluggish Growth Contexts: A Firm-Level Empirical Analysis (2015, background): “According to Ernst (2001), patent applications increase sales after a lag of 2 or 3 years, depending on the type of the patent system (national or European).”