Are smarter groups more cooperative? Evidence from prisoner's dilemma experiments, 1959–2003

By Garett Jones. 2008

163 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b2157f87139d92ace9d898fb6b8cf451ccb394d5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

1. Tom Lane
2. N. Johnson
3. Alexandra Mislin
4. Niklas Potrafke

In Safety Research

1. Tom Lane
2. N. Johnson
3. Alexandra Mislin
4. Niklas Potrafke
5. Alexander Maedche
6. Dennis Hummel

In Sociology and Political Science

1. N. Johnson
2. Niklas Potrafke
3. Tom Lane
4. Alexandra Mislin
5. Alexander Maedche
6. Dennis Hummel

Citations in the corpus

• Trust games: A meta-analysis (2011, result): “In this sense, our study most resembles those performed by Zelmer (2003) for the public goods game, Oosterbeek, Sloof, and Van de Kuilen (2004) for the ultimatum game, and Jones (2008) for the prisoner’s dilemma game.”
• Discrimination in the laboratory: A meta-analysis of economics experiments (2016, methodology): “1 Several meta-analyses of economics experiments have been released in recent years, including: Engel (2007) – oligopoly experiments; Prante et al. (2007) – Coasean bargaining; Jones (2008) – group cooperation in prisoners’ dilemmas; Hopfensitz (2009) – the effects of reference dependence and the ga”
• Intelligence and corruption (2012, methodology): “This finding corresponds, for example, with the study by Rindermann and Thompson (2011), who find that IQ influences economic freedom, and with the study by Jones (2011) showing that IQ influences political institutions.”
• Playing repeated games with large language models (2023, unknown): “What is, however, surprising is that they also perform well in the Prisoner’s Dilemma family of games, which is known to be challenging for human players [Jones, 2008].”
• Dictator games: a meta study (2011, unknown): “meta studies on economic experiments is still fairly limited (Druckman 1994; Harless and Camerer 1994; Croson and Marks 2000 ;Z elmer2003; Huck et al. 2004; Oosterbeek et al. 2004; Blackwell 2007; Engel 2007 ;P rante et al.2007; Jones 2008; Hopfensitz 2009; Percoco and Nijkamp 2009; Weizsacker 201”