Bargaining under time pressure in an experimental ultimatum game

139 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The dynamics of responder behavior in ultimatum games: a meta-study (2011, background): “5 See also Winter and Zamir (1997), Abbink, Bolton, Sadrieh, and Tang (2001), Armantier (2006), and Andreoni and Blanchard (2006).”
More than Thirty Years of Ultimatum Bargaining Experiments: Motives, Variations, and a Survey of the Recent Literature (2013, unknown): “The opposite, decision making under time pressure in the ultimatum game, has been studied by Sutter et al. (2003), with rejection rates of responders becoming significantly higher under a tight than under a very weak time constraint.”
Social value orientation moderates the effects of intuition versus reflection on responses to unfair ultimatum offers (2017, methodology): “…this research has revealed consequences for responses to unfair offers, so far the results did not converge into consistent conclusions regarding the nature of these consequences (e.g., Achziger et al., 2016; Grimm & Mengel, 2011; Hochman et al., 2015; Knoch et al., 2008; Sutter et al., 2003).”
Time is money - Time pressure, incentives, and the quality of decision-making (2006, background): “Only recently, Sutter et al. (2003) have begun to study the influence of time pressure in an interactive setting.”