Modelling the optimal conservation of interacting species

By L. Witting, J. Tomiuk, Volker Loeschcke. 2000

87 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b186dba06a963f3840d433cb5ea1c939dc461cbd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Atte Moilanen
2. Marie-Josée Fortin
3. B. Rayfield

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Atte Moilanen
2. Marie-Josée Fortin
3. G. Barker
4. B. Rayfield
5. Ilkka Hanski
6. M. Baguette
7. M. Cabeza
8. T. Tscharntke

Citations in the corpus

• Incorporating consumer–resource spatial interactions in reserve design (2009, background): “Until now, the pattern of interactions among species has mainly contributed towards deciding which suites of mutually dependent species should be prioritized for conservation (Witting et al., 2000; Soulé et al., 2003, 2005; van der Heide et al., 2005; Moulton et al., 2007) rather than informing deci”
• Phylogenetic diversity: a quantitative framework for measurement of priority and achievement in biodiversity conservation (2002, background): “Witting et al. (1994, 2000) provide equations for calculating probabilities when survivorship among species are correlated or indeed causally linked.”