Phylogenetic diversity: a quantitative framework for measurement of priority and achievement in biodiversity conservation

By G. Barker. 2002

110 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Geography, Planning and Development, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aa958e6c189f68a4191a8345f3f5912ae8bd826c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Geography, Planning and Development

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Is the originality of a species measurable (2005, background): “An index of species value based only on strict uniqueness, like that proposed by Barker (2002), is incomplete because it takes into consideration only endemism of characters which is essential yet does not contain all information on the contribution of a species to diversity.”
Integrating Phylogenetic Diversity, Complementarity, and Endemism for Conservation Assessment (2004, background): “Other recent applications and extensions of PD are reported by Smith et al. (2000), Polasky et al. (2001), Barker (2002), Rogrigues and Gaston (2002), and Sechrest et al. (2002).”
Mammals on the EDGE: Conservation Priorities Based on Threat and Phylogeny (2007, methodology): “Combining species’ conservation status with a measure of their contribution to PD is therefore desirable, because species can be retained as units but weighted appropriately [5,22].”
Phylogenetic trees do not reliably predict feature diversity (2014, background): “…that phylogenetic diversity identifies sets of taxa that maximize the accumulation of feature diversity is widespread (Faith, 1992a, 2013; Barker, 2002; Soutullo DOI: 10.1111/ddi.12188 600 http://wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/ddi ª 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd Diversity and Distributions,…”
Emerging patterns in the comparative analysis of phylogenetic community structure (2009, background): “Other metrics of phylogenetic diversity (and thus phylogenetic community structure) have also been proposed (Clarke & Warwick 1998; Shimatani 2001; Barker 2002; Ricotta 2004).”
Global patterns in the divergence between phylogenetic diversity and species richness in terrestrial birds (2017, background): “Grid cells that contain only one species cannot provide a minimum spanning path between two species, resulting in the exclusion of some cells in the Saharan desert and around the poles (Faith, 1992; Barker, 2002).”
A guide to phylogenetic metrics for conservation, community ecology and macroecology (2016, unknown): “Formulae for all metrics and additional details can be found in Appendix S1 (metrics from Colless, 1982; Rao, 1982; Faith, 1992; Weiher & Keddy, 1995; Clarke & Warwick, 1998, 2001; Izsák & Papp, 2000; Pybus & Harvey, 2000; Barker, 2002; Izsák & Szeidl, 2002; Webb et al., 2002; Redding, 2003; Lozupon”
Host introductions and the geography of parasite taxonomic diversity (2003, background): “Will this limit the diversity of their new parasite fauna compared with that in their heartland? The concept of phylogenetic diversity (Faith, 1992; Humphries et al., 1995; Barker, 2002) provides a useful framework in which to address this question and ask related ones.”