Incorporating consumer–resource spatial interactions in reserve design

89 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Optimizing resiliency of reserve networks to climate change: multispecies conservation planning in the Pacific Northwest, USA (2010, methodology): “These two distributions could be those of a consumer and its resource (Rayfield et al., 2009), or, as here, the current and future distribution of a species.”
Defining conservation priorities for freshwater fishes according to taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity (2011, methodology): “First, maintaining biotic interactions such as connectivity between consumers and their resources is rarely considered in freshwater conservation strategies, despite its importance in terrestrial conservation planning (Rayfield et al. 2009).”
Methods and workflow for spatial conservation prioritization using Zonation (2013, background): “For example, Rayfield et al. (2009) had different connectivity scales for home-range scale habitat use and for juvenile dispersal of the American marten.”