Clusters, networks, and firm innovativeness

By Geoffrey G. Bell. 2005

789 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b11422c75a1ce06de982b9126afcc98d493a99a2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

The effects of industry cluster knowledge management on innovation performance (2014, background): “Most extant studies on industrial clusters discuss the relationships and effects between innovation systems or activities, and clusters (Bell, 2005; Gnyawali & Srivastava, 2013; Phelps, 2010; Porter & Stern, 2001; White & Bruton, 2007; Yeh & Chang, 2003; Yli-Renko et al., 2001), the effects of…”
Innovation as a Knowledge-Based Outcome (2011, background): “Another popular measure is the adoption of innovations (Bell, 2005; Daft, 1978; Frambach et al., 1998; Leiblein and Madsen, 2009), which reflects innovation definitions such as ‘‘the first or early use of an idea’’ (Becker and Whisler, 1967, p. 463).”
Agglomeration Economies and Firm Performance: The Case of Industry Clusters (2010, background): “Some of the specific and varied agglomeration-related benefits mentioned in the literature include the improvement of labor productivity (Ciccone & Hall, 1996; Henderson, 1986), better collaboration (Saxenian, 1994), innovation stimuli (Bell, 2005; Harrison et al., 1996), and lower production costs ”
How knowledge links with universities may foster innovation: The case of a science park (2016, background): “…and Delmastro, 2002; Hansson, 2007; Löfsten and Lindelöf, 2005), little research has been undertaken for evaluating them using a network approach, which has been more typically developed in the fields of geographical and regional economics (Boschma and Ter Wal, 2007; Giuliani and Bell, 2005).”
Interorganizational Networks at the Network Level: A Review of the Empirical Literature on Whole Networks (2007, background): “Third, researchers focusing at the level of the network have tried to understand the impact of network-level structures and behaviors on individual organizations (e.g., Ahuja, 2000; Bell, 2005; Powell, Koput, & Smith-Doerr, 1996; Walker, Kogut, & Shan, 1997; Westphal, Gulati, & Shortell, 1997).”
Clusters, knowledge spillovers and new venture performance: An empirical examination (2008, background): “But scholars such as Bell (2005) and Deeds et al. (1997) suggest that cluster firm performance differs from other firms because of the easier access to knowledge spillovers that cluster firms have.”
Do clusters capabilities matter? An empirical application of the resource-based view in clusters (2007, methodology): “…located firms and non-located ones for the same industry as a method for proving and commenting upon the different cluster stock of resources and capabilities (Paniccia 1998, 1999, Giner and Santa Maria 2002, Molina 2002, Hervas 2004, Bell 2005) available at the cluster level for the located firms.”
Social networks and employee voice: The influence of team members' and team leaders' social network positions on employee voice (2016, background): “Centrality in the friendship network in the team indicates the extent to which a focal employee is considered to be a friend by other team members (Bell, 2005; Freeman, 1979), and can strengthen the relationship between employees’ workflow centrality and voice due to several reasons.”
The effects of innovation on firm performance of supporting industries in Hanoi – Vietnam (2016, neutral): “Literature of innovation shows that any firm needs innovation to succeed and survive (Jimenez & Sanz-Valle, 2011; Bell, 2005; Cho & Pucik, 2005; Gopalakrishnan & Damanpour, 1997; Damanpour, 1996; Fiol, 1996; Wolfe, 1994) and gain sustainable competitive advantage (Standing & Kiniti, 2011; Bartel &…”
Partner Geographic and Organizational Proximity and the Innovative Performance of Knowledge‐Creating Alliances (2014, positive): “In fact, firms tend to agglomerate in a handful of more innovative locations wherein spatial proximity facilitates interorganizational learning and the development of new knowledge (Saxenian, 1994; Baptista and Swann, 1998; Bell, 2005; Folta et al., 2006; Capello, 2009).”
The Regional Environment and a Firm’s Innovative Performance: A Plea for a Multilevel Interactionist Approach (2007, background): “It is interesting to note that most recent management and organization scholars have started to use the concept of clusters in their analyses of a firm’s competitiveness (Bell 2005; Ferreira, Li, and Tallman 2005; Tallman, Jenkins, Henry, and Pinch 2004; but also Pouder and St. John 1996).”
Non-R&D SMEs: external knowledge, absorptive capacity and product innovation (2014, background): “Like Bell (2005) and Uzzi (1996), we find that these networks are an important source of novel information for non-R&D firms; knowledge inflows from international and local personal networks have a positive effect on”
Network Capital, Social Capital and Knowledge Flow: How the Nature of Inter-organizational Networks Impacts on Innovation (2012, background): “Clearly, the fast speed of development in knowledge-based industries requires there to be relatively high levels of dynamism to ensure that the most appropriate partners are identified and engaged, if necessary in one-off project-based relationships (McEvily and Zaheer, 1999; Bell, 2005; Salman and ”