Smith After Sen

By V. Walsh. 2000

127 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Is Sen's Capability Approach an Adequate Basis for Considering Human Development? (2002, background): “A theory of capability not linked to a theory of need might be hollow and liable to mislead (cf. Hamilton, 1999; Walsh, 2000).”
The Economic Contributions of Amartya Sen (2000, background): “It is an economics which, as Vivian Walsh (2000) points out, harkens back to Adam Smith and classical political economy.”
Perfectionism, Paternalism and Liberalism in Sen and Nussbaum's Capability Approach (2002, background): “Walsh (2000) qualifies this explicit re-acceptance of values within economics ‘the second phase of classical economics’, after the first-phase of classical economists (neo-classical economists, what he calls the ‘minimalists’) flushed out the hidden values behind their formalism.”
Beyond Utilitarianism and Deontology: Ethics in Economics (2007, background): “It starts from the position, recently defended in this journal by Vivian Walsh ( 2000 , 2003 ) and Hilary Putnam (2003) , that fact and value are mutually related, both in the real world and in economic analysis.”
Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice: The Capability Approach Re-Examined (2017, unknown): “4 See Nussbaum (1988, 1992), Sen (1993a, 1999a, 14, 24); Walsh (2000); Qizilbash (2016); Basu and López-Calva (2011, 156–59).”