Is Sen's Capability Approach an Adequate Basis for Considering Human Development?
By D. Gasper. 2002
322 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2f298552ad5efc656ba69d0757ab0dc7e708e345
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
- S. Alkire
- D. Clark
- A. Frediani
- Diego Lanzi
- Audrey Verdier‐Chouchane
- Valérie Bérenger
- D. Gasper
- I. Robeyns
In Safety Research
- S. Alkire
- D. Clark
- A. Frediani
- Diego Lanzi
- Audrey Verdier‐Chouchane
- Valérie Bérenger
- D. Gasper
- Maria Emma Santos
In Sociology and Political Science
- S. Alkire
- D. Clark
- A. Frediani
- Diego Lanzi
- Audrey Verdier‐Chouchane
- Valérie Bérenger
- D. Gasper
- I. Robeyns
Citations in the corpus
- What is the capability approach?: Its core, rationale, partners and dangers (2007, background): “Alkire (2005b) suggests that we should in general describe and compare alternatives in terms of both criteria.10 Formally speaking, 9 A start is made in Gasper (2002), sections 5 and 6, and Gasper (2003).”
- Multidimensional Measures of Well-Being: Standard of Living and Quality of Life Across Countries (2007, background): “In the second approach, the HDI’s reductionist nature is also criticized but bigger questions are raised, such as the relationship between the capability approach and the concept of human development (Gasper, 2002), or broader ones, about the content and empirical measurement of ‘‘capabilities.’’”
- The Capability Approach: Using the capability approach: prospective and evaluative analyses (2008, background): “16 These have been done by Malenbaum, W. (1988). "Amartya Sen on Future Development Policy and Program: Review Article." Economic Development & Cultural Change 36(2): 401-09, Crocker, D. (1992). "Functioning and capabilities: the foundation of Sen's and Nussbaum's development ethic.”
- The Capability Approach: Its Development, Critiques and Recent Advances (2005, background): “He has also argued for a richer conception of human personality, which incorporates the variety of values and motives that influence human action (Gasper, 2002; 2004, p.180).”
- Capabilities, human capital and education (2007, background): “Nevertheless, as stressed by Gasper (2002) , human freedoms are not simply defined by what a person does or could do, but also by how much what she does is consistent with that she believes is right to do. Individuals must discuss, define and deliberate on which human values and ends have to be tak”
- Human well-being: concepts and conceptualizations (2004, background): “Giri 2000, Gasper 2002, Gasper and van Staveren 2003.) Let us look at his usage of the term ‘well-being’, and at whether capability is better seen as an interpretation of a person’s ‘advantage’.”
- Sen's capability approach and the many spaces of human well-being (2005, background): “3. Other aspects of the CA have been discussed by Alkire [2002a], Clark [2002], Gasper [2002; 2004] and Qizilbash [1996 ], amongst others.”
- Sen's Capability Approach as a framework to the practice of development (2010, background): “The concepts of functionings and capabilities are essential components of Sen’s Capability Approach, as Gasper (2002) shows.”