Male facial masculinity influences attributions of personality and reproductive strategy
By Daniel J. Kruger. 2006
130 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b0dab12d8d81672d63c0d7742e536a248888e18e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- B. Jones
- L. DeBruine
- Justin H. Park
- Steven W. Gangestad
- Vladas Griskevicius
- Joshua M. Tybur
- Abraham P. Buunk
- Debra Lieberman
In Gender Studies
- L. DeBruine
- Debra Lieberman
- Steven W. Gangestad
- Barnaby J. W. Dixson
- Vladas Griskevicius
- B. Jones
- R. Brooks
- Justin H. Park
In Sociology and Political Science
- Justin H. Park
- Joshua M. Tybur
- Vladas Griskevicius
- Abraham P. Buunk
- Shelli L. Dubbs
- R. Thornhill
- Debra Lieberman
- Steven W. Gangestad
Citations in the corpus
- Craniofacial Feminization, Social Tolerance, and the Origins of Behavioral Modernity (2014, background): “…of no physiological basis for linking ECV with either prenatal or circulating testosterone levels, we have included this variable because of the empirical association between reduced ECV and domestication (i.e., tameness) in various mammalian species (Hare, Wobber, and Wrangham 2012; Kruska 1988).”
- Parent–Offspring Conflict in Mate Preferences (2008, result): “For characteristics that connote heritable fitness, the mean score did not differ between men and women (p .23); however, for the characteristics that connote parental investment and cooperation, the mean score was somewhat higher among women (M 4.16) than among men (M 3.74; p .012).”
- Original Articles Hormonal correlates of women's mid-cycle preference for the scent of symmetry (2008, background): “Evidence suggests that men who possess the purported indicators of genetic quality may be relatively unwilling investors (Gangestad & Thornhill, 1997; Kruger, 2006; Penton-Voak & Perrett, 2001; Perrett et al., 1998); thus, women's mate choice may be forced to trade-off genetic benefits for investmen”
- Women's preferences for masculinity in male faces are predicted by pathogen disgust, but not by moral or sexual disgust (2010, background): “Masculine men are also perceived to have more interest in short-term than in long-term relationships (Kruger, 2006), and masculine men have more short-term, but not long-term, partners than feminine men do (Rhodes, Simmons & Peters, 2005).”
- The role of facial hair in women's perceptions of men's attractiveness, health, masculinity and parenting abilities (2013, background): “However, it is similar to Neave and Shields (2008), who found women preferred light stubble, with the lowest ratings given to fully bearded and clean-shaven faces.”
- Menstrual cycle shifts in women’s self-perception and motivation: A daily report method (2009, background): “The fact that men with a greater level of heritable qualities may be unwilling to invest in a partner or offspring (Kruger, 2006), suggests that women should be aware of the trade-off between investment and genetic qualities (Gangestad & Simpson, 2000) for example by accepting men that are willing t”