How Domestic and Foreign Firms Differ and Why Does it Matter

282 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Innovation, employment growth, and foreign ownership of firms (2014, background): “Foreign-owned firms can be a source of employment growth in their host countries (Barba Navaretti, 2004; Bellak, 2004).”
The innovative performance of foreign-owned enterprises in small open economies (2008, background): “There is sound empirical evidence that foreign-owned enterprises differ from domestically owned enterprises in a number of economic indicators (see Bellak 2004 for a review).”
Global Production Networks, Foreign Direct Investment, and Supplier Linkages in the Integrated Peripheries of the Automotive Industry (2018, background): “Additionally, I will also consider the possibility of negative effects of foreign subsidiaries on domestic firms (Hymer 1972; Bellak 2004) in the assembly platform type of structural couplings through what I call detrimental linkages relating to employment and labor market effects of FDI such as…”
Obligating, Pressuring, and Supporting Dimensions of the Environment and the Non-Market Advantages of Developing-Country Multinational Companies (2011, unknown): “This type of dimension explains why AMNCs tend to be better in their environmental, labour, and social relations and how AMNCs can successfully operate in authoritarian states where there are fewer stakeholders to satisfy (Bellak, 2004).”