The interactive work of prosody in the IRF exchange: Teacher repetition in feedback moves
By John Hellermann. Language in society, 2002
182 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b09366a1f701623d9c5ff71a97bb0c46914d8399
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Language and Linguistics
- Elizabeth Stokoe
- D. Edwards
- Tanya Stivers
- Arnulf Deppermann
- Jonathan Potter
- Galina B. Bolden
- Maurice Nevile
- S. Speer
In Literature and Literary Theory
- Elizabeth Stokoe
- D. Edwards
- Tanya Stivers
- Arnulf Deppermann
- Jonathan Potter
- Galina B. Bolden
- S. Speer
- Maurice Nevile
Citations in the corpus
- `Did you have permission to smash your neighbour's door?' Silly questions and their answers in police—suspect interrogations (2008, background): “However, with different prosody, they can also mark the pupil’s response as incomplete or incorrect (Hellerman, 2003), working as a repair initiator to prompt a fourth ‘correction’ turn (McHoul, 1990).”
- Classroom Discourse in Foreign Language Classrooms: A Review of the Literature (2012, unknown): “Using a conversational analytic approach, Hellermann (2003) analyzed the effects of prosody in a teacher’s follow-up/ feedback utterance in the third turn of the IRF interaction pattern to understand how it affected classroom discourse.”
- “No no no” and Other Types of Multiple Sayings in Social Interaction (2004, background): “However, if there is variation this tends to be with the final or next-to-final items (e.g., see Extract 4). Another variation is that later items in a multiple saying may not be as fully articulated (e.g., compare the first and subsequent articulations of “alright” in Extract 2). 2. Other conversat”