Postneoliberalism and its Malcontents

By Jamie Peck, N. Theodore, N. Brenner. 2012

554 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Finance, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b03e9b39b164848bbc6b449410c23bedd624027d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Finance

1. Jamie Peck
2. Simon Springer
3. Brett Christophers
4. Kean Birch
5. J. MacLeavy
6. G. Lin
7. C. Hadjimichalis
8. P. Allmendinger

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Jamie Peck
2. Kean Birch
3. Simon Springer
4. J. MacLeavy
5. G. Lin
6. N. Brenner
7. Brett Christophers
8. N. Theodore

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Jamie Peck
2. Kean Birch
3. Simon Springer
4. Brett Christophers
5. G. Lin
6. N. Theodore
7. J. MacLeavy
8. P. Allmendinger

Citations in the corpus

• The BRICs and the Washington Consensus: An introduction (2013, background): “This, in turn, led to what might be described as several rounds of ‘edits’ cut into the original version proposed by John Williamson (Rodrik, 2006; Peck et al., 2010; Birdsall and Fukuyama, 2011; Sheppeard and Leitner, 2012; Blyth, 2013; Babb, this issue).”
• Explaining (with) Neoliberalism (2013, background): “The Wall Street crash and its aftermath may have finally put paid to this myth, to the expectation that the entrenched and polymorphic phenomenon of neoliberalism might somehow still be vulnerable to a form of total ‘system failure’ (PECK et al., 2010).”
• The Handbook of Neoliberalism (2016, background): “Such has been the growth in the use of the term and the work it has been asked to do that it has become something of a ‘rascal concept’ (Smith 1987; Peck et al. 2009).”
• The Evolution and Trajectories of English Spatial Governance: ‘Neoliberal’ Episodes in Planning (2013, background): “This lack of clarity has led both Lovering (2007) and Peck et al. (2009) to conclude that it is more helpful to think about processes of ‘neoliberalization’, emphasizing the dynamic processes through which ‘neoliberalism’ is continuously being transformed.”
• Post‐neoliberalism in Latin America: Rebuilding and Reclaiming the State after Crisis (2012, background): “…fact, the significance of post-neoliberalism is perhaps more subtle than President Fernandez de Kirchner implies and it is certainly a rich source of polemic, academically and politically (see, for example, Castaneda and Morales, 2008; Lievesley and Ludlam, 2009; Peck et al., 2010; Roberts, 2008).”
• Variegated neoliberalization: geographies, modalities, pathways (2010, background): “At minimum, such a methodological orientation stands in strong contrast to the use of apocalyptic, Berlin Wall metaphors to interpret the possibility of countervailing, marketrestraining regulatory tendencies ( Peck et al. 2009 ).”
• Uneven geographical development and socio-spatial justice and solidarity: European regions after the 2009 financial crisis (2011, background): “We need to remember, however, that neoliberalism in Europe is far from homogeneous; there are different national or even regional strands, which leads us to talk about ‘real existing neoliberalisms’ (Peck et al., 2010).”