Variegated neoliberalization: geographies, modalities, pathways
By N. Brenner, Jamie Peck, N. Theodore. 2010
1,591 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Finance, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1f49184b4373c28c528db80fcf54de072f83d93d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Finance
- Simon Springer
- John Lauermann
- Fubing Su
- Ilias Alami
- Engelbert Stockhammer
- Hubert Buch-Hansen
- Ran Tao
- I. Scoones
In Political Science and International Relations
- I. Scoones
- Simon Springer
- John Lauermann
- Jamie Peck
- Ran Tao
- Fubing Su
- Ilias Alami
- Engelbert Stockhammer
In Strategy and Management
- Simon Springer
- Fubing Su
- Ilias Alami
- Engelbert Stockhammer
- Ran Tao
- D. Ciplet
- Janis Roberts
- J. McEntee
Citations in the corpus
- Austerity urbanism (2012, background): “…externalities, prompting ostensibly corrective, ‘rollout’ responses in the form of experimental governance, promarket reregulation, and all manner of short-term fixes, bandaids and bromides— complete with their own limits and contradictions (see Peck and Tickell, 2002; Brenner et al., 2010).”
- Neoliberalism as concept (2015, neutral): “It seems to suffer from ‘a perplexing mix of overreach and underspecification’ (Brenner et al., 2010, p. 2) and is used as a ‘constant master category that can be used both to understand and to explain all manner of political programs across a wide variety of settings’ (Rose et al., 2006, p. 97).”
- Platform economies and urban planning: Airbnb and regulated deregulation in London (2018, background): “…urban paradigm, however, urban neoliberalism is better thought of as developing in geographically and temporally uneven and variegated ways (Brenner et al., 2010) and as a heterogeneous and non-linear process of neoliberalisation (Peck, 2010), challenging and adapting to but also being…”
- The Hybrid Spatialities of Transition: Capitalism, Legacy and Uneven Urban Economic Restructuring (2014, background): “Certainly, capitalism itself evolves, responding to technological and institutional contexts, so that the patterns and intensities of uneven development have varied across time and space (Pike et al., 2007; Brenner et al., 2010).”
- Municipal statecraft (2018, background): “There is a tendency to interpret entrepreneurial urbanism as a reactionary politics in which municipalities respond to exogenous logics: the shift to post-Fordist regimes of accumulation (Harvey, 1990), national decentralization initiatives (Jessop, 2002), variegated neoliberalisms applied to cities”
- Neoliberal growth models, monetary union and the Euro crisis. A post-Keynesian perspective (2016, background): “There is an extensive debate on the nature of neoliberalism, where globalisation, financialisation and rising inequality have been identified as key features (Duménil and Lévy 2004, Harvey 2005, Glyn 2006, Foucault 2008, Brenner et al. 2010, Dardot and Laval 2013).”
- State capitalism(s) redux? Theories, tensions, controversies (2020, background): “underlying common processes), and the continuous reproduction of difference, both between state capitalism and other forms of capitalism, and between different varieties of state capitalism (Brenner et al., 2010).”
- Climate change and the transition to neoliberal environmental governance (2017, background): “Neoliberalism can be described as “ a politically guided intensi fi cation of market rule ” in the public realm (Brenner et al., 2010; 184).”
- A discursive construction of the Belt and Road Initiative: From neo-liberal to inclusive globalization (2018, neutral): “Neo-liberalism assumed a variety of forms (Brenner et al., 2010).”
- The China model withering? Institutional roots of China’s local developmentalism (2017, background): “At first glance, the Varieties of Capitalism (VoC) literature should offer a suitable framework for conceptualising the Chinese experience, given its insistence on the diverse institutional paths and modes of capitalism in the world economy (Brenner et al., 2009; Christopherson, 2002; Hall and Soski”