The BRICs and the Washington Consensus: An introduction

By Cornel Ban, M. Blyth. 2013

119 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Development, Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e70718793f4175a1463cba025bfb9556a4da145e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Development

1. Eli Berman
2. Daniel Hirschman

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Juliet Johnson
2. Andrew Barnes
3. Eli Berman
4. Daniel Hirschman
5. Benjamin Braun

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Juliet Johnson
2. Andrew Barnes
3. Eli Berman
4. Daniel Hirschman

Citations in the corpus

• Domestic structures, foreign economic policies and global economic order: Implications from the rise of large emerging economies (2015, unknown): “Our argument departs from the obvious correspondence between the policy outlook of global economic institutions and the domestic economic principles of the leading economic powers, which culminated in the (Post-) Washington Consensus under US hegemony.”
• Do economists make policies? On the political effects of economics (2014, background): “…traditions, and its policy effects vary cross-nationally (Dezalay and Garth, 2002; Fourcade-Gourinchas and Babb, 2002; Montecinos and Markoff, 2010; Ban and Blyth, 2013).3 While many of these differences must be explained ideographically, Halliday and Carruthers’ work on the legal profession…”
• Financial nationalism and its international enablers: The Hungarian experience (2015, background): “development bank (Armijo and Katada, 2014; Ban and Blyth, 2013).”