Does Co‐authorship Lead to Higher Academic Productivity?
By Lorenzo Ductor. 2015
226 citations recorded by the source corpus.
In recent decades, co-authorship and policies aimed at inducing academic collaboration have increased simultaneously. Assuming that intellectual collaboration is exogenously determined, prior studies found a negative relationship between co-authorship and productivity. I examine a panel data on economists publishing from 1970 to 2011 to test the causal effect of intellectual collaboration on intellectual output. As characteristics of the individual and her opportunity set are endogenously related to both collaboration and productivity, I instrument the amount of co-authorship by the common research interest between an author and her potential co-authors. After controlling for endogenous co-authorship formation, unobservable heterogeneity and time varying factors, the effect of intellectual collaboration on individual performance becomes positive.
Subfields: Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/db981cfe89a9571ccfa9ce7e9a2e4a97d645db34
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- On doing better science: From thrill of discovery to policy implications (2017, background): “Collaboration with coauthors—one failsafe way to boost output—is on the increase (Ductor, 2015).”