Relationships between direct predation and risk effects.

By S. Creel, D. Christianson. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2008

1,166 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6dcdb5ad3d4205a0011222bb9c107df2038e1ff7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Citations in the corpus

Hunting patterns and geographic profiling of white shark predation (2009, background): “predator–prey interactions; predation risk; optimal foraging; geographic profiling; sharks; seals.”
The ecological importance of intact top-predator populations: a synthesis of 15 years of research in a seagrass ecosystem (2012, background): “There is a diverse literature showing the potential reproductive, demographic, population and ecosystem consequences of risk effects in small-scale and some large-scale systems (e.g. Schmitz et al. 2004; Preisser et al. 2005; Creel and Christianson 2008).”
Shark and ray provisioning: functional insights into behavioral, ecological and physiological responses across multiple scales (2015, background): “…predators and prey It is now recognized that predators affect prey demo graphy and trophic interactions through both direct predation and induced behavior (i.e. nonconsumptive effects) that may cascade through communities (e.g. Preisser et al. 2005, Creel & Christianson 2008, Heithaus et al. 2008).”
Spatial responses to predators vary with prey escape mode (2010, background): “The propensity for predators to influence prey demography and trophic interactions via induced behaviour is now widely appreciated (Lima 1998; Preisser et al. 2005; Creel & Christianson 2008; Heithaus et al. 2008).”
Reactive responses of zebras to lion encounters shape their predator–prey space game at large scale (2016, background): “These behaviours are costly, both in terms of energy and time, and can ultimately influence prey fitness and population dynamics (Preisser et al. 2005, Creel and Christianson 2008, Zanette et al. 2011).”
Deep danger: intra-specific predation risk influences habitat use and aggregation formation of juvenile lemon sharks Negaprion brevirostris (2012, background): “Predators can influence prey communities through direct predation and also through the costs of antipredatory behavioural responses or risk effects (Abrams 1995, Lima 1998, Werner & Peacor 2006, Creel & Christianson 2008).”
Living in a landscape of fear: the impact of predation, resource availability and habitat structure on primate range use (2014, neutral): “Nevertheless, these risk effects are among the most difficult to quantify (Creel & Christianson, 2008; Creel, Winnie, Christianson, & Liley, 2008; Hill & Dunbar, 1998).”
Predation in bird populations (2011, background): “Yet predators actually killing prey may often be only a minor part of the effect of predation in populations (Sih 1987; Brown et al. 1999; Creel and Christianson 2008; see Cresswell 2008 for a review of this idea).”
Don't bite the hand that feeds: assessing ecological impacts of provisioning ecotourism on an apex marine predator (2012, background): “…apex predators; however, this is of particular concern in the light of recent studies demonstrating that changes in abundance and behaviour of apex predators may have cascading impacts on a variety of ecological processes (Ripple & Beschta 2007; Creel & Christianson 2008; Estes et al. 2011).”
Living and dying in a multi‐predator landscape of fear: roe deer are squeezed by contrasting pattern of predation risk imposed by lynx and humans (2014, background): “Understanding such non-lethal aspects of predation is critical, since they can have a net effect on populations that sometimes even outweighs the effect of direct predation (Creel and Christianson 2008, but see White et al. 2011, Middleton et al. 2013).”
Antipredator calls of tufted titmice and interspecific transfer of encoded threat information (2012, background): “…obviously reduces individual fitness, nonlethal predation threats can reduce prey fitness in a variety of ways (Lima and Dill 1990; Lima 1998; Creel and Christianson 2008), including restriction of access to resources as a result of fear-based alteration of use of space (Dolby and Grubb…”