Justice sensitivity and distributive decisions in experimental games
By Detlef Fetchenhauer, Xu Huang. 2004
202 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/af80f7940b7cd7a0a07ac3d5503dfd7927243728
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Dominic Abrams
- Julie Van de Vyver
- Anna Baumert
- Sebastian Lotz
- Thomas Schlösser
- F. Gresser
- Detlef Fetchenhauer
- Mario Gollwitzer
In Safety Research
- Dominic Abrams
- Julie Van de Vyver
- Anna Baumert
- Sebastian Lotz
- Thomas Schlösser
- Detlef Fetchenhauer
- F. Gresser
In Sociology and Political Science
- Julie Van de Vyver
- Dominic Abrams
- Anna Baumert
- Sebastian Lotz
- Thomas Schlösser
- F. Gresser
- Detlef Fetchenhauer
- Tobias Rothmund
Citations in the corpus
- Testing the prosocial effectiveness of the prototypical moral emotions: Elevation increases benevolent behaviors and outrage increases justice behaviors (2015, methodology): “We employed a modified experimental game to measure third-party bystander compensation and punishment in response to unfairness (Fetchenhauer & Huang, 2004; Lotz et al., 2011).”
- Why and when justice sensitivity leads to pro- and antisocial behavior (2009, background): “…the disadvantaged and equal split offers in a dictator game, whereas victim sensitivity correlates positively with antisocial behaviors such as immoral choices in enticing situations and delinquent behavior in real life (Fetchenhauer & Huang, 2004; Gollwitzer, Schmitt, Schalke, Maes, & Baer, 2005).”
- Perceived Injustice and Adverse Recovery Outcomes (2014, background): “…in situations that are characterized by a violation of basic human rights, transgressions of status or rank, or challenges to equity norms and just world beliefs (Fetchenhauer & Huang, 2004; Hafer & Begue, 2005; McParland & Eccleston, 2013; McParland & Knussen, 2010; Mohiyeddini & Schmitt, 1997).”
- Individual differences in third-party interventions: How justice sensitivity shapes altruistic punishment (2011, methodology): “Inconsistent with this alternative account, however, Fetchenhauer and Huang (2004) demonstrated an association between JS and altruistic punishment when no measure of emotion was included that may have triggered deliberation about the unfairness.”