Learning to Recognize Activities from the Wrong View Point
By Ali Farhadi, Mostafa Kamali Tabrizi. 2008
221 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Biomedical Engineering
- Hossein Rahmani
- Ajmal Saeed Mian
- Liang Wang
- Jun Liu
- Zhuolin Jiang
- Jingjing Zheng
- Mubarak Shah
- Yi Yang
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Luc Van Gool
- Xiaogang Wang
- Dacheng Tao
- Yi Yang
- Trevor Darrell
- Ming-Hsuan Yang
- Bernt Schiele
- Jitendra Malik
Citations in the corpus
- Histogram of Oriented Principal Components for Cross-View Action Recognition (2014, background): “Keywords: Spatio-temporal keypoint, pointcloud, view invariance.”
- HOPC: Histogram of Oriented Principal Components of 3D Pointclouds for Action Recognition (2014, background): “Another approach is to find a view independent latent space [7,8,12,14] in which features extracted from the actions captured at different view points are directly comparable.”
- Cross-View Action Modeling, Learning, and Recognition (2014, methodology): “Transfer learning-bsaed cross-view action recognition methods [3, 11, 25] are based on local appearance features.”
- View Adaptive Recurrent Neural Networks for High Performance Human Action Recognition from Skeleton Data (2017, background): “Researchers have paid much attention to this issue and designed view-invariant approaches for action recognition from color videos [16, 30, 3, 32, 20, 7, 33, 41, 23, 15, 22, 43, 44, 25, 49, 29, 8].”
- Efficient Learning of Domain-invariant Image Representations (2013, methodology): “Recently proposed feature adaptation methods [1, 2, 12, 13, 14, 15] offer a solution by learning a category-independent feature transform that maps target features into the source, pooling all training labels across categories.”
- Discriminative virtual views for cross-view action recognition (2012, methodology): “See [5, 25] for more details.”
- A latent model of discriminative aspect (2009, background): “Features consist of three channels: smoothed horizontal flow, smoothed vertical flow, and the silhouette.”
- Cross-View Action Recognition via Transferable Dictionary Learning (2016, methodology): “generated the same split-based features for correspondence video frames from both training and testing views [11].”
- A Comprehensive Study on Cross-View Gait Based Human Identification with Deep CNNs (2017, background): “For example, action recognition rates on the INRIA Xmas Motion Acquisition Sequences dataset [3] can drop from 80.0 percent [3] to lower than 20.0 percent [4], when evaluated under cross-view conditions.”
- Discovering Latent Domains for Multisource Domain Adaptation (2012, background): “Other work on feature-translation has included translating features between camera views to transfer activity models [13], and translating user preferences between text and image domains [14].”
- Cross-View Action Recognition over Heterogeneous Feature Spaces (2013, methodology): “From the perspective of cross-view action recognition, some work [2, 9, 20] is closely related to our approach.”
- Transfer Learning for Activity Recognition: A Survey (2013, methodology): “[20] Video camera View angle US Feature-space”
- Learning View-Invariant Sparse Representations for Cross-View Action Recognition (2013, methodology): “Instead of transferring the split-features as in [6], we transfer the indices of the non-zero elements (i.”
- Harnessing Lab Knowledge for Real-World Action Recognition (2014, methodology): “Similarly, the method in Farhadi and Tabrizi (2008) also deals with cross-view action recognition and is restrained to one specific multi-view dataset.”
- Cross-view activity recognition using Hankelets (2012, methodology): “Table 5 gives side by side the average accuracy using BoBHks with the accuracy of previous approaches [16, 7, 10, 6].”
- View-Invariant Action Recognition Using Latent Kernelized Structural SVM (2012, methodology): “Farhadi and Tabrizi [13] used Maximum Margin Clustering to generate split features in the source view and then learned the split features in the target view by the transferred split values from source view.”
- Cross-view action recognition via view knowledge transfer (2011, methodology): “We are particularly interested in [2], since they also transfer action models across views.”
- Reshaping Visual Datasets for Domain Adaptation (2013, background): “(In contrast, test sets for the object recognition datasets above are less heterogeneous.)”