Modelling the effects of establishing a marine reserve for mobile fish species

By P. Apostolaki, E. Milner‐Gulland, M. Mcallister, G. Kirkwood. 2002

158 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/af2e6688ab0e9b8dacbabbf21e3a26cbff09810d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

The Ecological and Evolutionary Consequences of Marine Reserves (2015, background): “Recognition of the potential for these human activities to affect ecosystem-level properties and the sustainable delivery of marine ecosystem services has led to a more holistic, ecosystem-based approach to marine resource management (Arkema et al. 2006).”
Managing mobile species with MPAs: the effects of mobility, larval dispersal, and fishing mortality on closure size (2009, methodology): “Previous models examining the interaction of mobility and closure effectiveness have looked at a limited range of closure sizes and mobilities (Hilborn et al., 2006), focused on specific stocks (Gue ´nette et al., 2000; Apostolaki, et al., 2002 ), or are based on low spatial resolution two-patch mo”
Connectivity, sustainability, and yield: bridging the gap between conventional fisheries management and marine protected areas (2009, background): “Many others (Holland and Brazee 1996; Guénette et al. 1998; Apostolaki et al. 2002; Botsford et al. 2003) have noted the generality of this result and have posited that a reserve can have a similar effect to increasing the age of first capture.”
MARINE RESERVES EXPLOIT POPULATION STRUCTURE AND LIFE HISTORY IN POTENTIALLY IMPROVING FISHERIES YIELDS (2005, background): “More detailed modeling studies that consider additional features of natural populations also provide hints that reserves may at times increase yields, albeit mostly for fisheries that are already in an overexploited state (Lauck et al. 1998, Sladek Nowlis and Roberts 1999, Apostolaki et al. 2002).”
Spatial management of Indian Ocean tropical tuna fisheries: potential and perspectives (2014, background): “…indicate that MPAs protecting juveniles are most effective, though MPAs around spawning areas or preferred foraging sites can produce benefits provided there isa strong difference in catchability inside and outside reserves (Pelletier and Magal, 1996; Apostolaki et al., 2002; West et al., 2009).”
Migratory marine species: their status, threats and conservation management needs (2014, background): “…but whether the reserve is beneficial or not depends on the life stages protected by the reserve, the migratory behaviour of the fish, and the level of fishing effort and size-selectivity of the fishery outside the reserve (Guénette et al., 2000; Apostolaki et al., 2002; West et al., 2009).”
Designing marine reserve networks for both conservation and fisheries management (2010, background): “Reserves protecting nursery or spawning grounds can increased yields of mobile fishery species (100).”