Factors affecting breeding dispersal in the facultatively colonial lesser kestrel: individual experience vs. conspecific cues

By D. Serrano, J. Tella, Manuel Guillermo Forero, J. Donázar. 2001

180 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ae749af16f1fcce7d5ae7cf53987f05017e47711

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. J. Tella
2. D. Serrano
3. J. Donázar
4. G. Schofield
5. G. Hays
6. W. Piper
7. Daniel Oro
8. E. Cam

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. D. Serrano
2. J. Tella
3. W. Piper
4. G. Hays
5. J. Donázar
6. G. Schofield
7. K. A. Katselidis
8. Daniel Oro

Citations in the corpus

• Making habitat selection more “familiar”: a review (2011, background): “2006), or, more often, some combination of the two (Danchin et al. 1998; Doligez et al. 1999; Schjorring et al. 2000; Serrano et al. 2001; Ward 2005).”
• Assessment of hypotheses about dispersal in a long-lived seabird using multistate capture–recapture models (2004, background): “It has been hypo sized that individuals use their own breeding success and the success of conspecifics as cues to assess expected location-specific fitness (Danchin et al. 1998; Doligez et al. 1999; Brown et al. 2000; Serrano et al. 2001), and that the decision regarding the location where they will”
• Inter-annual variability in the home range of breeding turtles: implications for current and future conservation management. (2010, background): “Hence while barometric pressure may serve as a cue of deteriorating habitat conditions to the turtles, the decision to ‘‘stay or go” may be based on a combination of previous experience, physiological condition and additional environmental parameters (Dieckmann et al., 1999; Forero et al., 1999; Ser”
• Roles of Raptors in a Changing World: From Flagships to Providers of Key Ecosystem Services (2016, background): “Using capture-recapture techniques, a wide array of individual, environmental and social correlates has been identified (e.g. Korpimäki, 1993; Wiklund, 1996; Serrano et al., 2001), but few studies have evaluated comprehensively the fitness payoffs of adopting different dispersal strategies (Forero e”
• SOCIAL AND INDIVIDUAL FEATURES AFFECTING NATAL DISPERSAL IN THE COLONIAL LESSER KESTREL (2003, methodology): “Further details of the studied population can be found in Serrano et al. (2001a) and Serrano and Tella (2003).”
• The heterospecific habitat copying hypothesis: can competitors indicate habitat quality? (2005, background): “The latter option is supported by evidence that breeders use components of their own fitness (i.e., personal information; Nager et al., 1996; Serrano et al., 2001) or the average reproductive success of conspecifics on a patch (i.”
• Application of central-place foraging theory shows the importance of Mediterranean dehesas for the conservation of the cinereous vulture, Aegypius monachus (2005, unknown): “…included as a random factor to control for the potential non-independence of data as well as to test for possible inter-individual diVerences in habitat selection, while “sex” (male and female) and “season” (breeding and non-breeding season) were considered as Wxed eVects (Serrano et al., 2001).”
• Dispersal within a spatially structured population of lesser kestrels: the role of spatial isolation and conspecific attraction (2003, methodology): “For the purposes of this study, we only considered those individuals that had bred in the colony where they were observed, i.e. those birds observed in a nest from 2 weeks preceding laying to the end of the fledgling dependence period (see Serrano et al. 2001 for further details).”