Inter-annual variability in the home range of breeding turtles: implications for current and future conservation management.

123 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Satellite tracking large numbers of individuals to infer population level dispersal and core areas for the protection of an endangered species (2013, methodology): “Table S1 lists the tracking devices used, with information on device programming, performance Diversity and Distributions, 19, 834–844, ª 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd 835 metrics and weights being available in our previous publications (e.g. Schofield et al., 2010a).”
Movement patterns of marine turtles in the Mediterranean Sea: a review (2014, background): “…females (Figure 1), as they (i) remained in the waters close to the nesting site during the breeding period, which, however, lasted a few days only (Schofield et al. 2010b, 2010c); (ii) mostly migrated away from Zakynthos towards disparate feeding grounds predominantly located in the Adriatic or…”
BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH: Fidelity to foraging sites, consistency of migration routes and habitat modulation of home range by sea turtles (2010, background): “Current sea turtle conservation strategies primarily focus on breeding areas, where both males and females aggregate (Miller, 1997; Fossette et al., 2008; Schofield et al., 2010).”