Dispersal within a spatially structured population of lesser kestrels: the role of spatial isolation and conspecific attraction

By D. Serrano, J. Tella. 2003

135 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/35dfee2541661ae904a6bfc438f4dc39fde6bdd1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. L. Fahrig
2. J. Tella
3. D. Serrano
4. J. Donázar
5. Manuel Guillermo Forero
6. D. Bender
7. T. Benton
8. D. Bowler

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. L. Fahrig
2. J. Donázar
3. T. Benton
4. D. Bowler
5. D. Bender
6. D. Serrano
7. J. Tella
8. Manuel Guillermo Forero

Citations in the corpus

• MATRIX STRUCTURE OBSCURES THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTERPATCH MOVEMENT AND PATCH SIZE AND ISOLATION (2005, background): “For example, Serrano and Tella (2003) suggested that the effects of patch size and isolation are accentuated for animals that display conspecific attraction.”
• Non‐optimal animal movement in human‐altered landscapes (2007, unknown): “…to cover type, the presence of conspecifics in a patch can be used as a cue of habitat quality, so that animals are more likely to move into areas or less likely to leave areas where conspecifics already occur (Stamps 1988; Lahaye, Gutierrez & Dunk 2001; Serrano & Tella 2003; Bowler & Benton 2005).”
• Inter-colony movements, at-sea behaviour and foraging in an immature seabird: results from GPS-PPT tracking, radio-tracking and stable isotope analysis (2011, background): “However, dispersal and migration are likely to be triggered by quite diVerent behavioural cues (Serrano and Tella 2003), such that movements during the inter-breeding period and movements during the breeding season will not necessarily correlate.”
• SOCIAL AND INDIVIDUAL FEATURES AFFECTING NATAL DISPERSAL IN THE COLONIAL LESSER KESTREL (2003, methodology): “Further details of the studied population can be found in Serrano et al. (2001a) and Serrano and Tella (2003).”
• DISPERSAL AND SOCIAL ATTRACTION AFFECT COLONY SELECTION AND DYNAMICS OF LESSER KESTRELS (2004, methodology): “Most individuals disperse from their natal colony, although they tend to be philopatric at a local scale by dispersing a median distance of 7225 m (Serrano and Tella 2003, Serrano et al. 2003).”
• The relative importance of patch habitat quality and landscape attributes on a declining steppe-bird metapopulation (2010, background): “Conspecific attraction may reduce search costs and has often been claimed for when interpreting patterns of aggregation in avian species (Serrano and Tella, 2003), potentially accentuating the decline of small and isolated populations (Fletcher, 2006).”
• Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics (2005, background): “Field studies support this expectation (e.g. butterflies : Hill et al., 1996; Kuussaari et al., 1996; Baguette et al., 2000; Roland et al., 2000; birds : Serrano & Tella, 2003) though studies have yet to reveal the exact relationship between dispersal distance and costs of dispersal.”