Qualitative research and content validity: developing best practices based on science and experience

By M. Brod, L. Tesler, T. Christensen. Quality of Life Research, 2009

931 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, General Health Professions, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ae0555686ce986dd97ac458bf7879604a4bbed3d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. M. Vaismoradi
2. Paul Andrews
3. H. Turunen
4. Judy Sayers

In General Health Professions

1. Paul Andrews
2. H. Turunen
3. Jacqueline Jones
4. S. Snelgrove
5. M. Vaismoradi
6. Judy Sayers

In Statistics and Probability

1. Paul Andrews
2. H. Turunen
3. M. Vaismoradi
4. Judy Sayers

Citations in the corpus

• Identifying Opportunities for Grade One Children to Acquire Foundational Number Sense: Developing a Framework for Cross Cultural Classroom Analyses (2015, methodology): “Following the completion of this process, categorical saturation (Brod et al. 2009) was confirmed by an analysis of those articles not included in the first tranche.”
• Theme development in qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis (2016, background): “Despite this variation all qualitative methodologies contribute to description and interpretation of complex phenomena, developing and revising understanding, rather than purely verifying earlier conclusions of theories.[3, 4]”