The Ball–Berry–Leuning and Tardieu–Davies stomatal models: synthesis and extension within a spatially aggregated picture of guard cell function

By Roderick C. Dewar. 2002

204 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/adfd474a22181777200110a6855b92c2ed0e8c4a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

In Global and Planetary Change

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

The control of stomata by water balance. (2005, methodology): “In a recent model (Dewar, 2002), the resistance-based version of the drawdown hypothesis is used to predict the steady-state response to humidity, but the R and ψs responses are captured by calculating epidermal water potential, ψe, with an external model, and then positing an interaction between…”
Optimizing stomatal conductance for maximum carbon gain under water stress: a meta-analysis across plant functional types and climates (2011, unknown): “More mechanistic models link stomatal aperture to changes in the pressure gradient along the soil–plant–atmosphere continuum or to drought-related chemical signals from roots (Sperry 2000; Dewar 2002; Gao et al. 2002; Buckley, Mott & Farquhar 2003).”
A hydromechanical and biochemical model of stomatal conductance (2003, methodology): “The second, which we call the ‘drawdown hypothesis’, suggests that steady-state stomatal responses to hydraulic perturbations are caused by a water potential gradient from epidermal to guard cells (Dewar 1995, 2002).”
Modelling C3 and C4 photosynthesis under water-stressed conditions (2008, background): “A number of models of photosynthesis account for the impact of plant water stress on stomatal conductance (e.g., Dewar 2002; Diaz-Espejo et al. 2006; Gao et al. 2002; Jarvis 1976; Tardieu and Davies 1993).”
An overview of models of stomatal conductance at the leaf level. (2010, methodology): “Dewar 2002 gs = c(Pg - Pe) gs = c(Dp - DY) ΔΨ = E k Δπ β δ = + ( ) [ ]⋅ ⋅ ( ){ } A R C d ABA net d i emin exp exp Ψ 34.”
The porous media model for the hydraulic system of a conifer tree: Linking sap flux data to transpiration rate (2006, background): “Moreover, because the focus of this model is on internal hydraulic control of water flux dynamics, dynamical changes in stomatal conductance (Tardieu and Davies, 1993; Friend, 1995; Leuning, 1995; Oren et al., 1999; Eamus and Shanahan, 2002; Dewar, 2002) are not included here.”
Biological constraints on water transport in the soil–plant–atmosphere system (2013, background): “However, stomatal closure may be initiated earlier in response to accumulation of ABA that is released by the roots when soil and root water potentials decline [58,99,125].”