The control of stomata by water balance.

By Thomas N. Buckley. New Phytologist, 2005

694 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/431105e0b7a39b0957c90994607847961cfac47a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Ecohydrological advances and applications in plant-water relations research: a review (2011, background): “The rate of T is dictated by a number of environmental factors, including the amount of plant available water from soils as indicated by plant water potential, as well as the difference in the water vapor pressure of the air inside and outside of a leaf (Dw) (Buckley 2005; Lambers and Chapin 2008).”
Responses of leaf stomatal density to water status and its relationship with photosynthesis in a grass (2008, methodology): “The constructive comments from anonymous reviewers are appreciated.”
Modelling C3 and C4 photosynthesis under water-stressed conditions (2008, background): “However, experimental observations show that, besides stomatal limitations (e.g., Buckley 2005; Chaves 1991; Cornic 2000; Flexas et al. 2004a), also ‘non-stomatal’ effects play an important role in limiting plant carbon assimilation under water stress (e.g., Ghannoum et al. 2003; Lawlor 1995, 2002;…”
Plant resistance to drought depends on timely stomatal closure. (2017, background): “Stomatal opening increases with guard cell turgor pressure (Franks et al. 1998; Buckley 2005), and it has been shown that stomatal closure in woody species is largely explained by losses of leaf turgor (Brodribb et al. 2003; Rodriguez-Dominguez et al. 2016).”
The peaked response of transpiration rate to vapour pressure deficit in field conditions can be explained by the temperature optimum of photosynthesis (2014, background): “For example, it is possible that hydraulic conductance 296 decreases at high D, which can cause a decrease in E at high D (see Buckley, 2005).”
Hydraulic and environmental limitations to leaf water relations in trees with respect to canopy position (2006, neutral): “Buckley TN. 2005.”
Plant responses to rising vapor pressure deficit. (2020, background): “The transient response arises from a decrease in the "backpressure" imposed on stomata by epidermal cells, and the steady state response arises from an even larger drop in guard cell turgor, driven by actively-mediated efflux of osmotic solutes (Buckley 2005).”
Biological constraints on water transport in the soil–plant–atmosphere system (2013, background): “A pressure drop induced by cavitation causes stomatal closure by altering the pressure balance between guard and epidermal cells [18,21,97].”
An overview of models of stomatal conductance at the leaf level. (2010, background): “Response of stomata to air humidity, transpiration rate and leaf water potential It has been often observed that air humidity (Hr) influences stomatal aperture (Lange et al. 1971), but the way Hr is sensed by the plant remains still a matter of debate (Oren et al. 1999; Meinzer 2002; Buckley 2005).”
Optimizing stomatal conductance for maximum carbon gain under water stress: a meta-analysis across plant functional types and climates (2011, neutral): “This could be expected to be critical in our analysis, since gC could be bound to lowerthan-optimal values as transpiration reaches the cavitation threshold because of strictly hydraulic limitations (Buckley 2005).”
Review: the interaction between rootstocks and cultivars (Vitis vinifera L.) to enhance drought tolerance in grapevine (2014, background): “(Buckley 2005).”
Xylem hydraulic physiology: the functional backbone of terrestrial plant productivity. (2009, background): “Undermost circumstances this assumption is well supported by experimental evidence [20] leading to the conclusion that guard cells respond to changes in Cleaf either directly or via a signal generated very close to the guard cells.”