Consumer and Marketing Implications of Information Provision: The Case of the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990

By Paul J. Petruccelli. 1996

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Dataset Nutrition Label: A Framework To Drive Higher Data Quality Standards (2018, background): “Though some cast doubt on the benefits of the mandate in light of its costs [15] , most research concludes that the “Nutrition Facts” label has positive impact [16,17] .”
Are Some Comparative Nutrition Claims Misleading? The Role of Nutrition Knowledge, Ad Claim Type and Disclosure Conditions (2000, background): “Given the FTC's case-by-case approach in regulating ad claims, food advertisers seek greater guidance as to what specific ad claims and messages may lead to gross misinterpretations by consumers (Colford 1994; Petruccelli 1996).”
Consumers' Use of Nutritional Labels: A Review of Research Studies and Issues (2006, background): “NLEA had as an objective to reduce consumers’ entanglement with respect to nutrition information by creating a standardized label and specifying which claims could be used and under which conditions (Pappalardo, 1996; Petruccelli, 1996; Silverglade, 1996).”