Lies in Disguise. An experimental study on cheating
By Urs Fischbacher, Franziska Heusi. 2013
1,187 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Decision Sciences, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ad7fa03d1af47857c7a4558687125d3f4c741268
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Decision Sciences
- Toke Reinholt Fosgaard
- Holger A. Rau
- Kerstin Grosch
- David Pascual-Ezama
- Catrine Jacobsen
- Johannes Abeler
- Daniel Houser
- Stefan Vetter
In Safety Research
- Toke Reinholt Fosgaard
- Francesca Gino
- David Pascual-Ezama
- Catrine Jacobsen
- Johannes Abeler
- Isabel Thielmann
- Holger A. Rau
- Benjamin E. Hilbig
In Sociology and Political Science
- Joseph Henrich
- Aiyana K. Willard
- Benjamin G. Purzycki
- Isabel Thielmann
- Francesca Gino
- Ara Norenzayan
- Quentin D. Atkinson
- Emma Cohen
Citations in the corpus
- The Mission: Human Capital Transmission, Economic Persistence, and Culture in South America* (2018, background): “76This familiar pattern is consistent with the ndings of Fischbacher and Föllmi-Heusi (2013).”
- Ethical Manoeuvring: Why People Avoid Both Major and Minor Lies (2010, positive): “Following the methods of Fischbacher and Heusi (2008) results supported the cost of lying hypothesis (H1): participants in the h3.”
- Gender differences in lying in sender-receiver games: A meta-analysis (2017, background): “In this way subjects are incentivized to misreport the outcome (Fischbacher & Föllmi-Heusi, 2013).”
- Why Do We Lie? A Practical Guide To The Dishonesty Literature (2018, background): “A widely known version of such a task is the die-in-a-cup paradigm, developed by Fischbacher and Föllmi-Heusi (2013), in which a subject rolls a die in a cup that has been covered so there is only a tiny hole through which the outcome can be observed.”
- Justified ethicality: Observing desired counterfactuals modifies ethical perceptions and behavior (2011, methodology): “Specifically, we adapted a simple paradigm introduced by Fischbacher and Heusi (2008) in which people privately roll a die and are paid based on what outcome they report.”
- The evolution of religion and morality: a synthesis of ethnographic and experimental evidence from eight societies (2017, methodology): “Drawing from the economics literature devoted to understanding dishonest behavior (Fischbacher & Föllmi-Heusi, 2013; Gigerenzer & Hug, 1992; Jiang, 2013), the Random Allocation Game measures behavioral deviations from rules in an economic game (Cohn, Fehr, & Maréchal, 2014; Hruschka et al., 2014;…”
- Laboratory Measure of Cheating Predicts School Misconduct (2018, positive): “…to increase their earnings by misreporting their outcomes without any risk of getting caught (e.g., Bucciol and Piovesan 2011; Shalvi et al. 2011; Fischbacher and Föllmi-Heusi 2013; Cohn et al. 2014; Abeler et al. 2016).2 Although cheating cannot be detected at the individual level, researchers…”
- Gender Differences in Honesty: Groups Versus Individuals (2015, methodology): “As in Fischbacher and Föllmi-Heusi (2013), subject i’s payment (in Euros) πi, is related to the declared outcome of the die roll r ∈ {1, ..., 6} as follows: πi = r for all r ≤ 5 and πi = 0 for r = 6.”