Community ecology of ectomycorrhizal fungi: an advancing interdisciplinary field

By A. Dahlberg. 2001

298 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cell Biology, Insect Science, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ad6cf21d8ce1d52c2a28b0cb80a3b91b8df6ea3a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cell Biology

1. M. Bahram
2. J. Pérez‐Moreno
3. S. Gamiet
4. Leho Tedersoo
5. J. Leake
6. C. Fischer
7. S. Simard
8. J. Spatafora

In Insect Science

1. S. Potts
2. Leho Tedersoo
3. C. Kremen
4. J. Leake
5. J. Garbaye
6. S. Simard
7. D. Read
8. Gretchen Daily

In Plant Science

1. Leho Tedersoo
2. J. Leake
3. S. Simard
4. D. Read
5. J. Garbaye
6. C. Kremen
7. S. Potts
8. David Tilman

Citations in the corpus

• Mycorrhizal fungi as drivers of ecosystem processes in heathland and boreal forest biomes (2004, background): “2000) and molecular (Gardes and Bruns 1996; Egger 1995; Dahlberg 2001; Horton and Bruns 2001) methods has largely confirmed the extent of this diversity but, more importantly, has revealed that the observed population of fungal fruit bodies above ground is not representative of the fungal community ”
• Respiration activity of ectomycorrhizas from Cenococcum geophilum and Lactarius sp. in relation to soil water potential in five beech forests (2003, background): “The increasing availability of powerful molecular markers has led to the extensive study of the genetic structure of ECM communities (Dahlberg, 2001; Horton and Bruns, 2001).”
• Production of external mycelium by ectomycorrhizal fungi in a norway spruce forest was reduced in response to nitrogen fertilization (2003, background): “EM fruit body production does, however, not necessarily reflect the activity of EM root tips and EM extramatrical mycelium (Gardes & Bruns, 1996; Jonsson et al ., 2000; Dahlberg, 2001).”
• Biodiversity Regulation of Ecosystem Services (2005, background): “Much less is known about the effects of the richness and composition of ectomycorrhizal fungi communities on ecosystem processes (Dahlberg 2001).”
• The relationship between forest age and aspect on the production of sporocarps of ectomycorrhizal fungi in Pinus sylvestris forests of the central Pyrenees (2004, result): “The abundance of rare or single fruitings of some fungi is congruent with recent molecular studies which reveal that the majority of ectomycorrhizal species present in forest soils rarely or never produce obvious fruit bodies (Dahlberg, 2001).”
• Fine root foraging strategies in Norway spruce forests across a European climate gradient (2011, background): “The mycorrhizal community of a forest is typically dominated by a few fungal species, with a large number of other species that are rare (Dahlberg, 2001).”
• Effects of clearcut logging and tree species composition on the diversity and community composition of epigeous fruit bodies formed by ectomycorrhizal fungi (2006, methodology): “Both forestry practices change ECM community composition and fruit body production compared with preharvest forest conditions (Pilz and Perry 1984; Deacon and Fleming 1992; Visser et al. 1998). According to Jones et al. (2003), clearcutting can cause a decline in ECM richness and fruit body producti”
• Early impacts of forest restoration treatments on the ectomycorrhizal fungal community and fine root biomass in a mixed conifer forest (2005, background): “Numerous studies in coniferous ecosystems have shown Thelephoraceae, non-thelephoroid resupinates (e.g. Piloderma) and Russulaceae among the most abundant and frequent EMF symbionts on roots (see reviews by Dahlberg 2001; Horton & Bruns 2001).”
• Response of ectomycorrhizal fungus sporocarp production to varying levels and patterns of green-tree retention (2004, background): “Such research holds promise as a great improvement over present approaches to determining effects of natural or anthropogenic disturbance on populations of EMF in forests (Dahlberg, 2001).”
• There is high potential for the formation of common mycorrhizal networks between understorey and canopy trees in a mixed evergreen forest (2003, unknown): “Similarly high spatial heterogeneity has been observed in other studies and appears to be a general pattern of ECM assemblages (Dahlberg 2001; Horton & Bruns 2001).”