Fine root foraging strategies in Norway spruce forests across a European climate gradient
By I. Ostonen, Heljä-Sisko Helmisaari, W. Borken, Leho Tedersoo, M. Kukumägi, M. Bahram, Antti‐Jussi Lindroos, P. Nöjd, V. Uri, P. Merilä and 2 more. 2011
206 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Insect Science, Plant Science, Soil Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b5a4c419d915f96b8f33b99eaca2d4edd01c0564
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Insect Science
In Plant Science
In Soil Science
- C. Roumet
- Christoph Leuschner
- D. Hertel
- H. Müller-Haubold
- Tanja Strecker
- Alexia Stokes
- E. Visser
- Antonio Montagnoli
Citations in the corpus
- Fine-root morphological and growth traits in a Turkey-oak stand in relation to seasonal changes in soil moisture in the Southern Apennines, Italy (2012, background): “(Ostonen et al. 2011), we investigated the seasonal var-”
- The distance decay of similarity in communities of ectomycorrhizal fungi in different ecosystems and scales (2013, background): “2006) and climate (Ostonen et al. 2011; Bahram et al. 2012; Tedersoo et al. 2012) in structuring the EcM fungal communities have been documented over different geographical scales.”
- Patterns in intraspecific variation in root traits are species‐specific along an elevation gradient (2020, background): “, 2019) or mycorrhizal colonization rates (Ostonen et al., 2011; Read et al., 2004; Zadworny et al., 2016) are”
- Variation of first‐order root traits across climatic gradients and evolutionary trends in geological time (2013, unknown): “Indeed, recent studies have begun to show marked variation in roots for traits such as root branching architecture, morphology and chemistry (Comas & Eissenstat, 2009; Holdaway et al., 2011; Ostonen et al., 2011).”
- Fine root biomass and dynamics in beech forests across a precipitation gradient – is optimal resource partitioning theory applicable to water‐limited mature trees? (2013, background): “…only by adjusting the size and positioning of their absorbing root surface area, but also by modifying root morphology and physiology in order to increase uptake efficiency under unfavourable conditions (L~ohmus, Oja & Lasn 1989; Eissenstat et al. 2000; Hertel & Wesche 2008; Ostonen et al. 2011).”
- Fine-root trait plasticity of beech (Fagus sylvatica) and spruce (Picea abies) forests on two contrasting soils (2017, background): “Belowground, other variables such as the anchorage and transport functions of roots (Poorter and Ryser 2015), or mycorrhizal interactions (Ostonen et al. 2011; Freschet et al. 2015) may constrain the plastic response of root morphology to soil resource availability only.”