The processing of derived and inflected suffixed words during reading

By Elizabeth Niswander, Alexander Pollatsek, Keith Rayner. 2000

93 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ad57850433189a769c6e6fac84e3631057b69fa3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Agreement Attraction in Comprehension: Representations and Processes. (2009, background): “Following ideas in Solomon and Pearlmutter (2004), we suggest that the key element that speech planning and retrieval in comprehension share is that they are sequence management tasks in which elements may be simultaneously active.”
Derivational morphology and base morpheme frequency (2010, unknown): “…& Gordon, 1999; Baayen, Dijkstra & Schreuder, 1997; Bradley, 1979; Burani & Caramazza, 1987; Colé, Beauvillain, & Segui, 1989; Meunier & Segui, 1999; Niswander, Pollatsek, & Rayner, 2000; Taft, 1979), supporting a more complex view of the mental lexicon which includes morphemic representations.”
Processing trade-offs in the reading of Dutch derived words (2010, methodology): “Previous research has shown that lexical processing of derived words is co-determined by the distributional properties of those words, as well as by the properties of their bases and affixes (cf. e.g., Bertram et al., 2000; Niswander et al., 2000; Plag & Baayen, 2009).”
Morphological analysis in sentence processing: An ERP study (2003, background): “…this theory as the means for isolating those sublexical units of a word stimulus that are most likely to encode basic units of lexical information, such as the specification of a verb’s tense (see Niswander et al. (2000) for evidence from eye-monitoring experiments and discussion of this point).”
The length of a complex word modifies the role of morphological structure: Evidence from eye movements when reading short and long Finnish compounds (2003, background): “In a similar vein, Niswander, Pollatsek, and Rayner (2000), in their first experiment, found a solid base frequency effect for long derivations (>9.5) in the first fixation duration and a solid surface frequency effect in both the second fixation duration and the gaze duration.”