On in situ attrition and vertebrate body part profiles

175 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

An Unshakable Middle Paleolithic? (2013, background): “…many other cases (e.g., Burke 2000; Conard and Prindiville 2000; Rendu 2010; Rendu et al. 2012; Speth and Tchernov 2001, 2007; Starkovich 2011; Stiner 1994, 2002, 2005) because there is no correlation to bone density, or similarly dense skeletal features are quantified across the axial and…”
Bone density studies in zooarchaeology (2003, unknown): “Proponents of the latter position [ 25 ] have preferred data derived by PD, which underestimates the density of middle shaft portions far more than the density of epiphyses, thus understating the differences between the two.”
Gazelle bone fat processing in the Levantine Epipalaeolithic (2005, background): “It is thus essential to distinguish the causes of bone fragmentation if we are to identify the most influential taphonomic agents of assemblage formation and subsequently reconstruct human behavior [92].”