Bone density studies in zooarchaeology
By Y. Lam, O. M. Pearson, Curtis W. Marean, Xingbin Chen. 2003
148 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Anthropology, Archeology, Paleontology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/63c2329c57b12475ebb34fccf2a544488c4f6619
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Anthropology
In Archeology
In Paleontology
Citations in the corpus
- The aging of Wolff's "law": ontogeny and responses to mechanical loading in cortical bone. (2004, background): “…model of the periosteal and endosteal contours of the bone in question; otherwise, measures of BMD and BMC may not accurately reflect the actual density (g/cm3) or the bending strength of the bone (Lam et al., 1998, 2003; Sievänen et al., 1998; Haapasalo et al., 2000; Kardinaal et al., 2000).”
- Fish bone chemistry and ultrastructure: implications for taphonomy and stable isotope analysis (2011, methodology): “Within the context of the preservation of archaeological bone, the density of bone samples has been studied in a number of taxa and utilized as an explanation for patterns of skeletal element representation (reviewed by Lam et al., 2003; Lam and Pearson, 2005; Lyman, 1984).”
- Gazelle bone fat processing in the Levantine Epipalaeolithic (2005, background): “’s [53] group C) are preferred here since they provide the most accurate measures of a bone’s external shape, yet they more closely match the values [77] used in our forthcoming analysis of hare density since they also do not account for long bone internal cavities (Lam et al.”