Which should you use, intuition or logic? Cultural differences in injunctive norms about reasoning

By Emma E. Buchtel, Ara Norenzayan. 2008

89 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ad534de487d986c5901d24c883a9817f316483f3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

1. K. Leung
2. Michael W. Morris

In Social Psychology

1. K. Leung
2. Michael W. Morris
3. Verónica Benet‐Martínez
4. M. Bond
5. Fanny M. Cheung
6. Peter B. Smith
7. Roy Y J Chua
8. Mike W.-L. Cheung

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Michael W. Morris
2. K. Leung
3. Roy Y J Chua
4. Fanny M. Cheung
5. M. Bond
6. Peter B. Smith
7. Mike W.-L. Cheung

Citations in the corpus

• Values, schemas, and norms in the culture–behavior nexus: A situated dynamics framework (2015, background): “Norenzayan and colleagues (Buchtel & Norenzayan, 2008; Norenzayan, Smith, Kim, & Nisbett, 2002) found that Westerners’ reliance on formal logic and East Asians’ reliance on intuitive association in tasks such as syllogism problems do not reflect different capacities, but different notions of what…”
• Beyond WEIRD: Towards a broad-based behavioral science (2010, unknown): “Furthermore, the analytic approach is culturally more valued in Western contexts, whereas the holistic approach is more valued in East Asian contexts, leading to normative judgments about cognitive strategies that differ across the respective populations (Buchtel & Norenzayan 2008).”