Segmenting preferences and habits of transit users and non-users

By K. Krizek, Ahmed El-Geneidy. 2007

184 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Building and Construction, Transportation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/acfef298c8728fcdb54fe3de9a93a026304244b3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Building and Construction

1. Yinhai Wang
2. Xiaolei Ma
3. Robbin Deboosere
4. Ahmed El-Geneidy
5. Zhiyong Cui
6. Ruimin Ke

In Transportation

1. Robbin Deboosere
2. Xiaolei Ma
3. Ahmed El-Geneidy
4. Yao-Jan Wu
5. Yinhai Wang
6. Dea van Lierop

Citations in the corpus

• Maintaining diversity in America's transit-rich neighborhoods: tools for equitable neighborhood change (2010, background): “…distinguish between two types of transit riders: those who use transit by necessity, sometimes disparagingly referred to as captive riders, and those who could use a vehicle for their trip but nonetheless choose to use transit, often referred to as choice riders (Krizek & El-Geneidy, 2007).”
• Mining smart card data for transit riders’ travel patterns (2013, background): “Key factors that influence transit ridership can also beidentified by integrating each market segment with transit riders’ socio-demographic attributes (Krizek and El-Geneidy, 2007).”
• Enjoying loyalty: The relationship between service quality, customer satisfaction, and behavioral intentions in public transit (2016, background): “…have an alternative transportation choice, while choice riders are those who choose to use transit even though another mode, usually a car, is available to them (Beimborn, Greenwald, & Jin, 2003; Jacques, Manaugh, & El-Geneidy, 2013; Krizek & El-Geneidy, 2007; Wilson, Stevens, & Robinson, 1984).”
• Evaluating equity and accessibility to jobs by public transport across Canada (2018, background): “In effect, this detailed accessibility measure provides a first step towards the segmentation of different groups within accessibility literature and practice – a common occurrence in studies on the different types of cyclists and public transport users (Damant-Sirois et al., 2014; Jensen, 1999; Kri”