Fast and SNP-tolerant detection of complex variants and splicing in short reads

By Thomas D. Wu, Serban Nacu. Bioinform., 2010

1,989 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Motivation: Next-generation sequencing captures sequence differences in reads relative to a reference genome or transcriptome, including splicing events and complex variants involving multiple mismatches and long indels. We present computational methods for fast detection of complex variants and splicing in short reads, based on a successively constrained search process of merging and filtering position lists from a genomic index. Our methods are implemented in GSNAP (Genomic Short-read Nucleotide Alignment Program), which can align both single- and paired-end reads as short as 14 nt and of arbitrarily long length. It can detect short- and long-distance splicing, including interchromosomal splicing, in individual reads, using probabilistic models or a database of known splice sites. Our program also permits SNP-tolerant alignment to a reference space of all possible combinations of major and minor alleles, and can align reads from bisulfite-treated DNA for the study of methylation state. Results: In comparison testing, GSNAP has speeds comparable to existing programs, especially in reads of ≥70 nt and is fastest in detecting complex variants with four or more mismatches or insertions of 1–9 nt and deletions of 1–30 nt. Although SNP tolerance does not increase alignment yield substantially, it affects alignment results in 7–8% of transcriptional reads, typically by revealing alternate genomic mappings for a read. Simulations of bisulfite-converted DNA show a decrease in identifying genomic positions uniquely in 6% of 36 nt reads and 3% of 70 nt reads. Availability: Source code in C and utility programs in Perl are freely available for download as part of the GMAP package at http://share.gene.com/gmap. Contact: twu@gene.com

Subfields: Genetics, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ace57ab6080e9b7538c7d519d848ca4cbd32c546

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

  1. Julian Catchen
  2. Steven L. Salzberg
  3. Jamie Stevens
  4. J. Paris
  5. John C. Marioni
  6. Katharina Jasmin Hoff
  7. Sarah A. Teichmann
  8. Paul A Hohenlohe

In Molecular Biology

  1. Steven L. Salzberg
  2. John C. Marioni
  3. Cole Trapnell
  4. Jeffrey T. Leek
  5. Sarah A. Teichmann
  6. Julian Catchen
  7. Heng Li
  8. Gordon K. Smyth

Citations in the corpus