Econometric Studies of Higher Education.

116 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Learning to Live with League Tables and Ranking: The Experience of Institutional Leaders (2008, background): “…the competition between institutions for top students…research indicates that applicant behaviour is very much conditioned by rankings’ (Ehrenberg, 2004, 26); slight changes can ‘cause perceptible ebbs and flows in the number and quality of applicants’ (Dichev, 2001, 238; Sauder and…”
How College Affects Students: Ten Directions for Future Research (2006, background): “…of postsecondary education to an individual’s labormarket success and personal life after college (e.g., Baum & Payea, 2004; Boesel & Fredland, 1999; Ehrenberg, 2004; Hartog & Oosterbeek, 1998; Knox, Lindsay, & Kolb, 1993; Leslie & Brinkman, 1988; Pascarella & Terenzini, 1991, 2005; Paulsen,…”
The Benefits of Higher Education: Sex, Racial/Ethnic, and Socioeconomic Group Differences (2005, methodology): “Based on his review of prior research, Ronald Ehrenberg (2004) concluded that, after controlling for selection bias, research generally shows that starting salaries are higher for individuals who attend the most selective colleges and universities than for other individuals.”
INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURES AND STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (2006, background): “Selection bias is not an obscure technical issue to be debated among statisticians; it is instead one of the biggest econometric problems faced by higher education researchers today (Ehrenberg, 2004).”