Analysis of Circumplex Models

By T. Tracey. 2000

121 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/acb97fda762d2542e8f6a5992645748308864044

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Shalom H. Schwartz
2. P. Ekkekakis
3. K. Boehnke
4. M. Gurtman
5. S. Petruzzello
6. Florencia M. Sortheix

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. P. Ekkekakis
2. S. Petruzzello
3. Shalom H. Schwartz
4. K. Boehnke
5. M. Gurtman
6. Florencia M. Sortheix
7. G. Maio

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Shalom H. Schwartz
2. P. Ekkekakis
3. K. Boehnke
4. M. Gurtman
5. S. Petruzzello

Citations in the corpus

• Exploring Personality with the Interpersonal Circumplex (2009, methodology): “Tracey (2000) provides perhaps the best current source on the statistical methods and approaches for evaluating circumplex models (see also Gurtman & Pincus, 2003).”
• Analysis of the affect measurement conundrum in exercise psychology: IV. A conceptual case for the affect circumplex (2002, methodology): “As a consequence of this complexity, circumplex-specific statistical models, computational methods, and user-friendly software are still in the process of being developed (e.g., Browne, 1992; Tracey, 2000).”
• Evaluating the structure of human values with confirmatory factor analysis (2004, background): “The past 45 years have seen a steady stream of papers that propose that the best way to represent personality and affect is a circumplex structure (Fabrigar, Visser, & Browne, 1997; Tracey, 2000).”