My strengths count!: Effects of a strengths-based psychological climate on positive affect and job performance

By Marianne van Woerkom, Maria Christina Meyers. 2015

168 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ac2bf5c28f33bbc8b31f0ce64c2ffd28e4924fa7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Marianne van Woerkom
2. Maria Christina Meyers
3. Arnold B. Bakker
4. Wido G M Oerlemans
5. Wilmar B. Schaufeli
6. Evangelia Demerouti
7. Osman M. Karatepe

In Clinical Psychology

1. Marianne van Woerkom
2. Maria Christina Meyers
3. Arnold B. Bakker
4. Wido G M Oerlemans
5. Evangelia Demerouti
6. Daantje Derks
7. M. Tims
8. Wilmar B. Schaufeli

In Social Psychology

1. Marianne van Woerkom
2. Arnold B. Bakker
3. Wido G M Oerlemans
4. Maria Christina Meyers
5. Wilmar B. Schaufeli
6. Evangelia Demerouti
7. M. Tims
8. Daantje Derks

Citations in the corpus

• Effects of a Strengths Intervention on General and Work-Related Well-Being: The Mediating Role of Positive Affect (2017, background): “Research has shown that such a climate is not only related to higher employee well-being, but also to higher in-role and extra-role performance (van Woerkom and Meyers 2014).”
• Strengthening personal growth: The effects of a strengths intervention on personal growth initiative (2018, background): “This is an important extension of existing, primarily correlational studies showing that strengths use at work is associated with employee outcomes such aswork engagement,GSE andwell-being (Harzer&Ruch, 2012, 2013; van Woerkom & Meyers, 2015; van Woerkom et al., 2016).”
• Strengths use and work engagement: a weekly diary study (2016, background): “Moreover, Van Woerkom and Meyers (2015) showed with confirmatory factor analysis that a strengths-based climate and POS are empirically distinct and only moderately correlated (r = .49, p .001).”