Asymmetric contests with general technologies
By R. Cornes, Roger T. Hartley. 2005
380 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Safety Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/abee07bf8e12c3b4087b8233137e2ae72d513270
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Science and Operations Research
In Safety Research
- Roman M. Sheremeta
- Johannes Münster
- A. Robson
- Stergios Skaperdas
- Ron Siegel
- Subhasish M. Chowdhury
- Dan Kovenock
- Emmanuel Dechenaux
Citations in the corpus
- Costly enforcement of property rights and the Coase theorem (2008, positive): “Cornes and Hartley [13] use the same assumptions on f to prove existence and uniqueness in pure strategies.”
- All-Pay Contests (2009, background): “Recent contributions to this large, single-prize literature that accommodate a degree of asymmetry include Cornes & Hartley (2005) and Szymanski & Valletti (2005).”
- Generalized contest success functions (2009, neutral): “P k2N ( k · xk + yk) , 8 i 2 N. ( 5 ) The nature of the contest might suggest that one of the investments should be treated as fixed for all contestants (say, yi = yi, 8 i 2 N) since it is not subject to choice during the”
- Contest Design: An Experimental Investigation (2009, positive): “Although Clark and Riis (1998) do not prove the uniqueness of the pure strategy equilibrium (3), in our specific case the equilibrium is indeed unique (Szidarovszky and Okuguchi, 1997; Cornes and Hartley, 2005).”
- The generalized Stackelberg equilibrium of the all-pay auction with complete information (2007, background): “� xl(2)], because of ( 5 ), and smaller than this for all x outside this interval.”
- Asymmetric Contests with Conditional Investments (2010, background): “Setting c (x) = x and γi = 1 in (11) and (12) delivers the equilibrium described in their Proposition 1.”
- Group contest success functions (2009, background): “2 A related situation arises in multi-activity contests between individuals as studied in Epstein and Hefeker (2003), Arbatskaya and Mialon (2009), and Caruso (2006).”