Privacy, Trust, and Disclosure: Exploring Barriers to Electronic Commerce

By Miriam J. Metzger. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun., 2006

469 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/abc3e80bc310d8337d5d4c434ca65a4d1d5f1b6e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

The role of affect and cognition on online consumers' decision to disclose personal information to unfamiliar online vendors (2011, background): “Privacy protection belief refers to the subjective probability that consumers believe that a specific online vendor will protect their private information as expected [38] [48] [51].”
Privacy, Trust, and Self-Disclosure Online (2010, methodology): “The trust measure comprised eight items that incorporated the major dimensions of trust (Bhattacherjee, 2002; Jarvenpaa, Knoll, & Leiner, 1998; Metzger, 2004): Benevolence (e.g., “The intentions of this survey are good”; “The data I have provided will be kept secure and not exploited”), Competence…”
Trust and Privacy Concern Within Social Networking Sites: A Comparison of Facebook and MySpace (2007, background): “Electronic commerce research has found trust to be strongly related to information disclosure (Metzger, 2004).”
Consumer Privacy Concerns and Preference for Degree of Regulatory Control (2009, background): “Metzger (2004) fi nds that users’ privacy concerns negatively affect their trust in Web sites, and Schoenbachler and Gordon (2002) explore the role of trust in consumers’ willingness to provide the information necessary to build a strong relationship with marketers.”
Information Privacy Concerns: Linking Individual Perceptions with Institutional Privacy Assurances (2011, unknown): “When people disclose or open their personal space to others, they give away something that they feel belongs to them and, therefore, that they should retain control over it, even after disclosure (Metzger, 2004, 2007).”
The effect of social influence, trust, and entertainment value on social media use: Evidence from Pakistan (2020, background): “, 2003), and it is deemed critical for SNS (Metzger, 2004).”
The Taste for Privacy: An Analysis of College Student Privacy Settings in an Online Social Network (2008, background): “Meanwhile, the Internet has long been a hot topic for scholars interested in privacy (e.g. Kirsh, Phillips, & McIntyre, 1996; Regan, 2002; Metzger, 2004; Vie´gas, 2005), and the phenomenon of Facebook is just beginning to capture these researchers’ attention (e.g. Gross & Acquisti, 2005; Acquisti &…”