The five-factor model and personality disorder empirical literature: A meta-analytic review.

By Lisa Saulsman, Andrew C. Page. Clinical Psychology Review, 2004

901 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ab9230413d6a3834962b2033e1213be2069eef9c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Interpersonal Dynamics in Personality and Personality Disorders (2018, background): “Meta-analytic findings of systematic links between normal range traits and PDs (Samuel & Widiger, 2008; Saulsman & Page, 2004) and research showing that clinical experts are able to construe PDs using trait concepts (Lynam & Widiger, 2001; Miller, Lynam, Widiger, & Leukefeld, 2001) provide a strong…”
Emotional intelligence and Borderline personality disorder (2009, background): “Given that trait EI overlaps with neuroticism (e.g. Petrides & Furnham, 2001), which is characteristic of BPDs (Saulsman & Page, 2004), it is not surprising that those with BPD appear lower on trait EI.”
Public Health Significance of Neuroticism (2009, background): “As shown in Table 2, a meta-analytic review of this literature (Saulsman & Page, 2004) found medium effect sizes for associations between neuroticism and borderline, avoidant, and dependent personality disorders, and smaller effect sizes for schizotypal, paranoid, and antisocial personality…”
Exploring the Relations Among Executive Functions, Fluid Intelligence, and Personality (2009, background): “For instance , impulsivity has been linked with a number of personality traits (Whiteside & Lynam, 2001) as well as personality disorders (PDs; Saulsman & Page, 2004).”
Assessment and diagnosis of personality disorder: perennial issues and an emerging reconceptualization. (2007, background): “More specifically, the DSM PDs can be characterized with the FFM conceptually—by both clinical researchers (Widiger et al. 2002) and practicing clinicians (Samuel & Widiger 2004, 2006; Sprock 2002, 2003)—and empirically (O’Connor 2005, Saulsman & Page 2004).”
Old Wine in New Bottles? The Case of Self–Compassion and Neuroticism (2017, neutral): “…in reverse (cf. Costa & McCrae, 1980; Heaven, Mulligan, Merrilees, Woods, & Fairooz, 2001; John, Robins, & Pervin, 2008; Kööts-Ausmees et al., 2016; Lee, 2009; Malouff, Thorsteinsson, & Schutte, 2005; Ormel et al., 2013; Saulsman & Page, 2004; Schimmack, Oishi, Furr, & Funder, 2004; Widiger, 2009).”
Alternative dimensional models of personality disorder: finding a common ground. (2005, result): “…MPQ scale for aggression), consistent with the considerable amount of research indicating a continuum between normal and abnormal personality functioning (Cloninger, 2000; Livesley, 2001; Reynolds & Clark, 2001; Saulsman & Page, 2004; Trull & Durrett, in press; Tyrer, 2001; Widiger & Costa, 2002).”
A meta-analytic review of the relationships between the five-factor model and DSM-IV-TR personality disorders: a facet level analysis. (2008, methodology): “Taken together, the O'Connor (2005) and Saulsman and Page (2004) studies provide compelling support for understanding the DSM personality disorders as maladaptive or extreme variants of the domains of the FFM.”
A meta‐analysis of psychopathy‐, antisocial PD‐ and FFM associations (2009, background): “Recently, Samuel and Widiger (2008b) replicated and extended the work of Saulsman and Page (2004) through a domain and facet-level analysis that provides a more specific and nuanced description of each DSM-IV-TR PD. Copyright # 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Eur.”
Plate tectonics in the classification of personality disorder: shifting to a dimensional model. (2007, background): “Independent reviews of the many studies that have related measures of the FFM to personality disorder symptomatology have concluded that the latter can be well understood as maladaptive variants of the FFM (Clark, in press; Livesley, 2001; Saulsman & Page, 2004).”
Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism: a nomological network analysis. (2011, background): “…10 PDs. Vulnerable narcissism is strongly correlated with Neuroticism/ negative emotionality, which is a core component of many DSM-IV PDs (e.g., Saulsman & Page, 2004) and may be linked to a tendency to endorse symptoms of all forms of psychopathology, including somatic problems (e.g.,…”