Regulation of emotional well-being: Overcoming the hedonic treadmill.

By R. Larsen, Z. Prizmić. 2008

126 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Exploring University ESL/EFL Teachers’ Emotional Well-Being and Emotional Regulation in the United States, Japan and Austria (2018, background): “We focus on two categories: 1) to adapt to negativity or negative events, and 2) to increase or lengthen positivity or positive events (Larsen & Prizmic, 2008).”
The Contributions of Positive and Negative Affect to Emotional Well-Being (2009, methodology): “In searching for the answer to how much stronger NA is compared to PA, Larsen and Prizmic (2008) summarize from the above studies that the magnitude difference between PA and NA has a wide range, going from 2.3 to 5.1 across samples in the published literature.”
Longitudinal academic outcomes predicted by early adolescents’ subjective well-being, psychopathology, and mental health status yielded from a dual factor model (2011, background): “…1743–9760 print/ISSN 1743–9779 online 2011 Taylor & Francis DOI: 10.1080/17439760.2010.536774 http://www.informaworld.com emotional experiences) is often considered the hedonic component of SWB due to the fact that emotions are adjusted based upon situational influences (Larsen & Prizmic, 2008).”