The Role of Self- and Functional Congruity in Cruising Intentions
By Kam Hung, J. Petrick. 2011
113 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Marketing, Sociology and Political Science, Transportation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ab2bfa7ee369c48dac5dae80ae34cf7d66b29566
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Marketing
In Sociology and Political Science
In Transportation
Citations in the corpus
- Self-congruity theory in consumer behavior: A little history (2018, background): “…this construct is a strong predictor of brand choice (e.g. Ascher, 1985; Beerli et al., 2007; Ericksen & Sirgy, 1992; Hsieh & O’Leary, 1994; Hung & Petrick, 2011; Jackson, 1973; Klenosky, Charles, & Michael, 1993; Krishen & Sirgy, 2016; Pizam & Calantone, 1987; Sheldon & Mark, 1987; Sirgy et…”
- Understanding Potential and Repeat Visitors’ Travel Intentions: The Roles of Travel Motivations, Destination Image, and Visitor Image Congruity (2021, background): “Previous studies have also shown that visitor image congruity influences travel intentions (Hung and Petrick 2011a; Pratt and Sparks 2014; Usakli and Baloglu 2011).”
- Self-Congruity and Functional Congruity in Brand Loyalty (2015, background): “The higher the functional congruity, the more customers perceive the positive images of name-brand coffee shops (Hung & Petrick, 2011).”
- Effects of brand personality, self-congruity and functional congruity on hotel brand loyalty (2019, background): “Hung and Petrick (2011, 2012)) similarly asserted that self-congruity and functional congruity positively affect cruising intentions of tourists. Su and Reynolds (2017) also discovered the greater influence of functional congruity than self-congruity on hotel guests’ brand attitude, which claims tha”
- Destination image and tourist loyalty: A meta-analysis (2014, methodology): “These measurements, termed as behavioral intention in Hung and Petrick (2011), were categorized into composite loyalty.”