Interrelations between travel mode choice and trip distance: trends in Germany 1976-2002

205 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Good Intents, but Low Impacts: Diverging Importance of Motivational and Socioeconomic Determinants Explaining Pro-Environmental Behavior, Energy Use, and Carbon Footprint (2018, background): “Notably, travel distances and travel modes strongly depend on geographical location: There tend to be more environmentally friendly travel options (e.g., public transport) in urban areas than in suburban or rural areas (Scheiner, 2010).”
Going soft: on how Subjective Variables Explain Modal Choices for Leisure Travel (2011, background): “…sports and theatre acting; family visits and fun shopping) because we assume that lifestyles and the built environment have a larger impact on optional or discretionary trips than on routine or recurrent trips (like commuting) (Boarnet and Sarmiento, 1998; Meurs and Haaijer, 2001; Scheiner, 2010a).”
Factors influencing modal split of commuting journeys in medium-size European cities (2013, methodology): “…number of registered cars per 1,000 residents (CAR RATE) increases, as expected and in line with Balcombe et al. (2004), Chen et al (2008), Kain and Liu (2002), Kim and Ulfarsson (2008), Kitamura (2009), Paulley et al. (2006), Pinjari et al (2007), Sabir (2011), Scheiner (2010) and White (2009).”