Social Loafing on Group Projects
By P. Aggarwal, C. O’Brien. 2008
228 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Education, Management of Technology and Innovation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ab104d1e868c448f22a18d43ec1f45cac17b372d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
In Education
- Gary L. Hunter
- Fasawang Pattanpichet
- David Hall
- Luke Greenacre
- L. Freeman
- S. Buzwell
- Steven A. Taylor
- Ching-Ying Pan
In Management of Technology and Innovation
Citations in the corpus
- Student Engagement and Marketing Classes (2011, background): “(2002), Results reported herein Recommend explicitly identifying course intentions to articulate relevance to future professional employment as a course pedagogical objective. Encourage writing assignments that have students attempt to make these linkages on their own, perhaps based on articles, suc”
- The problem of free-riding in group projects: Looking beyond social loafing as reason for non-contribution (2013, methodology): “However, despite previous studies having examined the concern (e.g. Aggarwal and O’Brien, 2008), it is an ongoing problem that negatively affects the benefit of group projects.”
- An Examination of Socially Destructive Behaviors in Group Work (2011, background): “They may also be able to exclude the loafing student from participating in the project to minimize any harm to the group as a whole if loafing persists (Aggarwal & O’Brien, 2008; O’Sullivan et al., 1996).”
- The Effects Of Using Collaborative Learning To Enhance Students English Speaking Achievement (2011, methodology): “The questionnaire was taken from Brown‟s (2008) questionnaire about collaborative learning using a four-rating scale ranging from strongly agree (4), agree (3), disagree (2) and strongly disagree (1).”