Where to look: a study of human-robot engagement
By C. Sidner, Cory D. Kidd, Christopher Lee, Neal Lesh. 2004
378 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Control and Systems Engineering, Social Psychology, Human-Computer Interaction, Robotics & Control
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Control and Systems Engineering
- Daniel Vlasic
- Jovan Popovic
- Hanspeter Pfister
- Craig Ferguson
- Geert-Jan M. Kruijff
- Hendrik Zender
- Maja J. Mataric
- Patric Jensfelt
In Social Psychology
- Brian Scassellati
- Henny Admoni
- Hanspeter Pfister
- Bilge Mutlu
- Craig Ferguson
- Hiroshi Ishiguro
- Maja J. Mataric
- Norihiro Hagita
In Human-Computer Interaction
- Hanspeter Pfister
- Jovan Popovic
- Bilge Mutlu
- Hiroshi Ishiguro
- Norihiro Hagita
- Brian Scassellati
- Henny Admoni
- Shixiang Shane Gu
In Robotics & Control
- Bilge Mutlu
- Brian Scassellati
- Henny Admoni
- Shixiang Shane Gu
- Wolfram Burgard
- Natasha Jaques
- Daniel Cremers
- Cynthia Lynn Breazeal
Citations in the corpus
- Human-centric Dialog Training via Offline Reinforcement Learning (2020, background): “Further, prior work has found that eliciting longer conversations can be a signal of engagement (Sidner et al., 2004; Zhou et al., 2018), and that reducing repetition and increasing specificity on the part of the model can improve conversation quality (See et al., 2019; Mehri and Eskenazi, 2020).”
- Face transfer with multilinear models (2005, methodology): “…face model, we first acquire a range of 3D face scans, put them in full correspondence, appropriately arrange them into a data tensor (Figure 3), and use the N-mode SVD to compute a model that captures the face geometry and its variation due to attributes such as identity and expression.”
- Conceptual spatial representations for indoor mobile robots (2008, background): “In combination with the dialogue model, this is closely related to [21].”
- Footing in human-robot conversations: How robots might shape participant roles using gaze cues (2009, background): “In human-computer interaction research, the use of gaze cues in conversations has been extensively studied in the context of designing embodied conversational agents [8,21,26,36,40].”
- How Robot Verbal Feedback Can Improve Team Performance in Human-Robot Task Collaborations (2015, background): “Relevant prior research on human-machine collaboration includes an extensive body of work on top-down deliberative approaches for modeling and constructing shared plans for collaboration [6, 18].”
- Designing persuasive robots: How robots might persuade people using vocal and nonverbal cues (2012, background): “While a considerable amount of research in robotics has explored the role of non-verbal cues in human-robot interaction (e.g., [47, 5, 25]), the way in which these cues might shape the persuasive ability of a robot has not yet been studied.”
- Social eye gaze in human-robot interaction (2017, background): “Tour guide robots might present a new technology to a user (Sidner, Kidd, Lee, & Lesh, 2004), provide route directions (Ono, Imai, & Ishiguro, 2001; Satake et al., 2010), or give location tours of indoor spaces (Knight & Simmons, 2013).”
- To Err is Human(-like): Effects of Robot Gesture on Perceived Anthropomorphism and Likability (2013, background): “Since a large body of research (e.g., [17, 23, 26, 27]) has already focused on the role of robot gaze in human-robot interaction (HRI), our investigations concentrate on hand and arm gesture as a specific subpart of non-verbal communicative behavior.”