Spiritual Transcendence and the Scientific Study of Spirituality
By R. Piedmont. 2001
262 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aa8e856e280409c2bb818de468af7d5313018c6d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Gabriel S. Dy-Liacco
- J. Ciarrochi
- Joseph E. G. Williams
- M. Leach
- Sherry L. Beaumont
Citations in the corpus
- Spirituality in the Workplace: Theory and Measurement (2011, unknown): “…& Pratt, 2003; Cloninger, Svrakic, & Przybeck, 1993; Elkins et al., 1988; Ellermann & Reed, 2001; Emmons, 1999; Emmons, Cheung, & Tehrani, 1998; Frankl, 2006; Friedman, 1983; Giacalone & Jurkiewicz, 2003; MacDonald, 2000; MacDonald et al., 1999a, 1999b; Piedmont, 1999, 2001; Wilber, 2006).”
- Identity Processing and Personal Wisdom: An Information-Oriented Identity Style Predicts Self-Actualization and Self-Transcendence (2009, background): “, Erikson, 1982; Frankl, 2000) as well as by previous research showing positive associations between self-transcendence and purpose in life (Piedmont, 2001).”
- Cross-Cultural Generalizability of the Spiritual Transcendence Scale in India (2002, background): “With this perspective in mind, Piedmont (2001) defined spirituality as an individual’s efforts to construe a broad sense of personal meaning within an eschatological context.”
- Cross-cultural generalizability of the Spiritual Transcendence Scale to the Philippines: Spirituality as a human universal (2007, methodology): “Developed by Piedmont (1999, 2001), this 24-item scale consists of three subscales: Universality (a belief in the unity and purpose of life), Prayer Fulfillment (an experienced feeling of joy and contentment that results from prayer and/or meditation), and Connectedness (a sense of personal…”
- The empirical and conceptual value of the spiritual transcendence and religious involvement scales for personality research. (2009, methodology): “Second, it was developed within the context of the FFM in an effort to capture aspects of spirituality that were nonredundant with these established personality domains (Piedmont, 2001).”